To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1427341 ) 12/5/2023 1:16:14 PM From: Tenchusatsu Respond to of 1573690 Wharfie, Pay no attention to this I'm paying every attention to it, because it's the exact "logic" that the Harvard sophists use. For example:“Nothing happens by accident,” said another source. “When a 3-year-old girl is killed in a home in Gaza, it’s because someone in the army decided it wasn’t a big deal for her to be killed — that it was a price worth paying in order to hit [another] target. We are not Hamas. These are not random rockets. Everything is intentional. We know exactly how much collateral damage there is in every home.” On the surface, I have no reason to doubt the veracity of this paragraph. However, they never mentioned that the target Israel was trying to hit INTENTIONALLY HID behind that 3-year-old girl. In fact, it's part of Hamas' not-so-secret sinister plan, which is to commit the most brutal atrocities against Israeli civilians, then bait out an "overreaction" so that the Harvard sophists can put pressure against the United States from supporting Israel. There there's this:According to the investigation, another reason for the large number of targets, and the extensive harm to civilian life in Gaza, is the widespread use of a system called “Habsora” (“The Gospel”), which is largely built on artificial intelligence and can “generate” targets almost automatically at a rate that far exceeds what was previously possible. This AI system, as described by a former intelligence officer, essentially facilitates a “mass assassination factory.” This is a blatant exaggeration of AI's capabilities and is intended to evoke fears of Skynet. In reality, AI is simply used as a mass facial recognition system. Israel wants to know exactly what they're targeting and whether they're actually going after the correct targets. This would normally be used for trying to minimize civilian casualties, but since Hamas is hiding behind said civilians, that doesn't really matter much. So instead it's more of a "Are we using our shells and our missiles effectively? Are they actually hitting the targets that we are aiming for?" Because Israel could simply just employ the RuZZian strategy of carpet-bombing the shit out of Gaza like Bakhmut. Finally, there's this:Another source said that a senior intelligence officer told his officers after October 7 that the goal was to “kill as many Hamas operatives as possible,” for which the criteria around harming Palestinian civilians were significantly relaxed. As such, there are “cases in which we shell based on a wide cellular pinpointing of where the target is, killing civilians. This is often done to save time, instead of doing a little more work to get a more accurate pinpointing,” said the source. Golly, that sounds like an effective strategy for a full-scale war, don't you think? Most Israelis agree with Net-N-Yahoo declaring one against Hamas. I agree with it, too. But nope, peaceniks and Harvard sophists think Israel ought to wage a "more humane war" where the lives of Hamas militants should be spared if there is even a 1% chance of a civilian casualty. Anyway, thanks for the link Wharfie. It reminds me that Hamas' plan is working exactly as intended. Tenchusatsu