Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sm1th who wrote (15664)	12/16/2023 2:08:46 AM
From: roto	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 15987

it had to do with land ownership. by 1948 Palestinians owned +90% of the lands then. there was no Israel as a nation, without the forfeiture of Palestinian land ownership legal or otherwise. Arafat was correct in refusing, what was at time +20yrs ago, a verbal agreement. What.. so called Israeli- Palestinian peace accords, with the understanding of Palestinian statehood, would of paled in comparison to what Palestine would have been if Palestinian statehood was established in the late '40's. Think of it this way.. how many British soldiers died in the late '40's as a result of Jewish exclusion of anything resembling Palestinian statehood. The Jews back then & since are not honorable. It is all Israel or nothing.