Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2443)	2/17/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: TEDennis	Respond to of 3391

Jeff: Re: Posts on other threads ... I agree. And, I think everybody who reads that post has the same chance to be affected in one way or another. Subtlety is sometimes more effective than blatancy. Particularly when prior attempts at blatancy haven't worked. Wow ... 2442 ... the same coming and going. Major coolness. Sure is a pretty day ... TED

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2443)	2/17/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: Tech Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

Jeff- This stock is flying..... right in the toilet. Wow, the big news sure is making an impact.... This company sucks.... But stay tuned..... The tech fully automated campaign has just begun..... Think the NASDAQ listing will happen this quarter? Answer- yeah right.... Why doesn't this company have any projections for 98? Answer- the losses won't be good hype material...

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2443)	2/17/1998 4:53:00 PM
From: tech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

Mr. Mitchell. I have not made any posts on the ALYD thread or on this thread, in which I have knowingly or intentionally posted false or misleading information. I have gone out of my way to post factual information and to make certain that I post links to relevant information that support my viewpoint. Mr. angel, and your buddy, TECH MASTER, have consistently posted false and misleading information on this thread. In fact, angel, has knowingly and intentionally posted so much false and inaccurate information that it would probably take days for me to find every instance. I find it rather telling that you can't contradict the content of my posts, so you resort to personal attacks.