To: goldworldnet who wrote (410212 ) 12/19/2023 11:28:57 PM From: FJB 5 RecommendationsRecommended By
Read Replies (1) | Respond to The Colorado Supreme Court 4-3 Decision Is Pure Nonsense and Can Be Laughed At, They Even Admit It on Page 9 Sundance | 70 Comments 213 page opinion HERE ] #1) It was a 4-3 decision. Meaning it was the politics of the court, literally the political makeup and perspective therein, that determined the outcome of the decision. This is showcased in point #3, which is the funniest part.[the complainants] asserted that he was ineligible under Section Three because he engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, after swearing an oath as President to support the U.S. Constitution. ” [ pdf, page 6 ] REMINDER – President Donald Trump was not charged with “insurrection,” is not accused of “insurrection,” does not fit the complaint under the definitions of “insurrection,” and has never been found guilty of insurrection. The complaint is moot before the court. But hey, it’s Lawfare … and we all know Lawfare is created for public media consumption, so that takes us directly to the biggest point.pdf page 9 ]. The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you ,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption. look it up – they live in CO ) will backfire bigly. The public backlash against a judicial ruling that interferes with the right of the citizens to determine their own election candidates plays perfectly into the sunlight operation against the Lawfare left.(more…)
