SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longz who wrote (1430076)12/22/2023 11:58:52 AM
From: pocotrader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572686
 
I saw that, not getting an EV anytime soon, no place to charge one in my condo anyway



To: longz who wrote (1430076)12/22/2023 12:18:20 PM
From: miraje  Respond to of 1572686
 
$60,000 EV battery replacement bill

Here's the YouTube video link to that story..

youtube.com

Buyer beware..



To: longz who wrote (1430076)12/23/2023 11:07:15 AM
From: Mongo21163 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
ralfph
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572686
 
J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar and former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, promoted the idea that the 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from seeking a second term. | Anna Moneymaker

On Tuesday, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump is barred from reclaiming the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits people who “have engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding political office. That argument has gained traction in some legal circles in recent months thanks in part to the work of J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar and former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, who, together with the liberal law professor Laurence Tribe, promoted the idea that the 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from seeking a second term.

This isn’t the first time Luttig has played a central role in arguments about Trump’s eligibility for office. After the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, Luttig published an op-ed in The Washington Post arguing that the Constitution prohibits Congress from impeaching a president once he or she has left office. Luttig’s op-ed found an eager audience on Capitol Hill, where several Republicans cited his legal argument as a reason for opposing Trump’s impeachment.

I spoke with Judge Luttig by phone to discuss whether he regrets the way Republicans used his arguments in Trump’s second impeachment (he says he’s “agnostic” about it) and whether he believes the Supreme Court will affirm the Colorado court’s decision: “I believe [it] should — and I believe it will.”