Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 12:33:26 PM
From: longz	Respond to of 1573927

Childhood was stolen.

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 12:35:35 PM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By Bill Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Yup. Science that resists dissent is propaganda not Science. Case closed

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 12:36:19 PM
From: longz	Respond to of 1573927

Snow covered beaches in Galveston, TX, 2021

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 1:12:54 PM
From: longz	Respond to of 1573927

duznt u no He learn't dat sience in cawledge its got to be write....

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 1:24:55 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Not one whoring for $$ and chasing government grants Then I guess you would condemn the University of Washington. It received the second most grant money for research last year from the U.S. Government of any university in the country,

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 1:27:47 PM
From: Wharf Rat	2 Recommendations Recommended By denizen48 pocotrader Respond to of 1573927

"A real scientist is open to examining all available evidence, not picking and choosing that which to embrace and which to ignore." You know who picks and choses? Deniers. -- "And to claim that humans can control and direct the climate is a truly arrogant and stupid belief." If we could control it, temperature and precipitation wouldn't be changing.

To: miraje who wrote (1430457)	12/24/2023 1:33:11 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Scientific consensus on climate change There is a strong scientific consensus that the Earth has been consistently warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution, and the rate of recent warming is largely unprecedented. [1]:?8? [2]:?11? This warming is mainly caused by the rapid increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) since 1750 from human activities such as fossil fuel combustion, "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cement#CO2<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cement#_emissions">cement production, and land use changes such as deforestation, [3]:?10–11? with a significant supporting role from the other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide. [1]:?7? This human role in climate change is now considered "unequivocal" and "incontrovertible". [1]:?4? [2]:?4? Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change. [4] [5] Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%, [6] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change. [7] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus often contain errors or cannot be replicated. [8]....... en.wikipedia.org