SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (203351)12/25/2023 8:35:10 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
Re <<I must ask, what were you drinking/smoking when you wrote the post I am responding to?

Just having a bit of harmless fun?>>

Either egg nog or hot cocoa, do not remember, and therefore likely egg nog squared.

It is the fun season, after all.

Shall head to Koh Samui soon,, and once there, the smoking can be paired with the drinking, allowing for better reports

Speaking of reports, the kids got me a nice present, a Remington machine!!!

However, the Coconut wants me to retrieve the similar machine from deep storage to get to her. I shall do so. The machine belonged to my dada and in working order. He wrote a lot.

The Jack would like to put together his second Windows computation as soon as our abode renovation is done, lasting from now to May 2024. Okay.


However, and no, I do not just make up stuff. I curate :0)))

- the Okinawa base is now less permanent than a week ago, because the Pentagon is recognising that the base would disappear in a hurry at time of high noon

asia.nikkei.com
U.S. weighs returning smaller permanent fighter force to Okinawa

Unless and until the US permit Japan and therefore S Korea to both go nuclear, any alliance structure involving the three is merely disguised occupation, and the Japanese (including soon to departing Kishida) / S Koreans know it.

But, yes, there is actually a dispute between Okinawa and Japan, on the one hand, and Okinawa and USA on the other. History, whilst strange, is complicated.

jacobin.com
Sacrificial Pawns

en.wikipedia.org.
An autosomal DNA analysis from Okinawan samples concluded that they are most closely related to other Japanese and East Asian contemporary populations, sharing on average 80% admixture with mainland Japanese and 19% admixture with Chinese population, and that have isolate characteristics.
en.wikipedia.org
Ryukyu independence movement
scmp.com
In Okinawa, Ryukyu royalty descendant stands firm on independence from Japan
- Self-rule campaigner aims for prefecture’s freedom to choose its own security alliances and diplomatic ties
- An independent Ryukyu would create a ‘recreation centre’ that would welcome warships from every nearby nation, including North Korea

BTW, the outfits are Chinese and the architecture in the background are similarly Chinese, both of Tang dynasty genre, simply because cannot be helped, or as some say, close-enough for government work, and the Tang Dynasty is just the fourth to last dynasty, almost modern history in the grand sweep of happenings :0)

blogs.biomedcentral.com–%203600%20years%20ago
Such similarities are also reflected in our genetic data. The genetic difference between any of the three groups is less than 1% of their total genetic diversity, which is much smaller than that between any of the groups and a European population (~10%). Accordingly, the three groups separated from each other from their recent common ancestor only 3,000 ~ 3,600 years ago, roughly corresponding to the Shang Dynasty in Chinese history.
Shang Dynasty is well within the recorded history of China China China per



Another BTW, territorial dispute just tee-ed up between Japan and USA.

Related but not exactly same as the matter re the South China Sea, which is resolving towards solution rapidly, w/ the Philippines tee-ed up by outsiders to be test case. How it resolves shall give us a hint re 2026 - 2032
bloomberg.com

... actual red-handed Bloomberg article appended way below ...

Annotation:

The Putin up the stakes by lateral-escalation arming N Korea with solid-fuelled road-mobile ICBM nukes. Let us see if Team USA calls.

Would not be surprised that the Canadians get tee-ed up for federation based on joint-threat meme, but the surging crowds across the southern frontier likely a true bother.
As China / Russia get jigsaw-ed together Team USA needs to bulk up, and fast, is how broad sweeps of hyper super ultra overarching psycho history mathematics work. Find details in

In the epic struggle between the MAGA USA he/him and she/her and everybody in between, and the Rejuvenation China fellows and fellowettes, four outcomes broadly possible, them be lose / lose, lose / win, win / lose, and win / win.

One side intends to win by busybody gross interference and easy betrayal knee-capping of others, started with ... drum roll, Japan 1982, and now progressed to ... drum roll ... 2022 Germany and so far Japan downed, Germany downing, whilst the other side, namely Team China China China CPC CPC CPC hoping to win-win by ways of unifying communications, connectivities, and common prosperity. Let us see how it goes.

As noted earlier, we are here

and need to make it across to over there

and all the current hot conflicts just so much footnotes.

Some footnotes are at critical state as far as broad sweeps of history go. Play right, then another duration by dispensation of history, or do a fail, might matter much in a hurry.

Another guess, Russian arctic, supported by Team China, shall see belting and roading big time and fast.

Assessing China’s and Russia’s Arctic Ambitions



Assessing China’s and Russia’s Arctic AmbitionsInsights from Kristina Spohr.




Taiwan issue becomes ever more important, electioneering underway for Q1 interim waypoint.

2024 kicking off looking gold bullish, and besides merely earthly matters,

China mulls $10 trillion Earth-moon economic zone



China mulls $10 trillion Earth-moon economic zoneChina is mulling of establishing an Earth-moon space economic zone by 2050, with insiders expecting the zone to ...



nssaspace.org

"For example, the PRC could establish an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in cislunar space, declare a Space Defense Identification Zone (SDIZ) and “keep out” zones to protect it, conduct in-situ resource utilization to support operations on the lunar surface, and extract valuable resources such as rare Earth materials and"

edition.cnn.com

etc etc etc

Here below, fresh put out, spun and weaved by suspect Bloomberg ... including a new territorial dispute between USA and ... drum roll ... Japan. Yeup.

Scroll down to highlighted portion of the Bloomberg article. "The State Department said in its response to questions that the US would need to establish maritime boundaries in the future with Canada, the Bahamas and Japan where their claims overlap."

Suggest Japan join the resistance and Canada, together with Germany and S Korea, do a flipping. Just saying.

A guess, that deflation-inflation on way, unless offset by gold still to be discovered and at calibrated pace per not too fast and not too dawdling.

Finally, the focus of this posting ...

US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for Resources

US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for ResourcesState Department releases new extended continental shelf map Claims stretch into Arctic, a potentially resource-rich area
Danielle Bochove23 December 2023 at 02:48 GMT+8

US adds a million square kilometers of Continental shelf claim.

Source: US Department of State

The US extended its claims on the ocean floor by an area twice the size of California, securing rights to potentially resource-rich seabeds at a time when Washington is ramping up efforts to safeguard supplies of minerals key to future technologies.

The so-called Extended Continental Shelf covers about 1 million square kilometers (386,100 square miles), predominantly in the Arctic and Bering Sea, an area of increasing strategic importance where Canada and Russia also have claims. The US has also declared the shelf’s boundaries in the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf of Mexico.

Read More: Russia’s Next Standoff With the West Is in the Oil-Rich Arctic

The long-awaited announcement earlier this week maps the outer reaches of the US continental shelf, the country’s land territory under the sea. Under international law, countries have economic rights to natural resources on, and under, the seabed floor based on the boundaries of their continental shelves.

“It’s a huge deal because it’s a huge amount of territory,” said Rebecca Pincus, director of the Polar Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, which has devoted an entire web page to the ramifications of this week’s news. “It’s US sovereignty over the seabed floor, and so whether it’s seabed mining, or oil and gas leasing, or cables, or what have you, the US is announcing the borders of its ECS and will have sovereignty over those decisions.”

The US State Department said that the development “is about geography, not resources.”

The US, like all countries, has “an inherent interest in knowing, and declaring to others, the extent of its ECS and thus where it is entitled to exercise sovereign rights” it said in an emailed response to questions. Continued mapping and exploration will be needed to understand the areas’ habitats, ecosystems, biodiversity and resources, it added.

While it’s unclear what materials, if any, can be exploited, the claims come as Washington seeks to boost access to so-called critical minerals that are necessary for electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy projects, industries the Biden administration has tagged as key national security concerns. Meanwhile, there are competing calls to protect the fragile Arctic environment — the fastest warming part of the planet — as climate change opens up the region to potential development.

Resource PotentialThe US continental shelf contains 50 hard minerals, including lithium and tellurium, and 16 rare earth elements, James Kraska, chair and professor of International Maritime Law at the US Naval War College, wrote in an article this week. The extension “highlights American strategic interests in securing these hard minerals on its seabed and subsoil, lying sometimes hundreds of miles offshore,” he wrote.

The most recent assessment by the US Geological Survey, conducted in 2008, estimated that about 90 billion barrels of undiscovered oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of gas lie inside the Arctic Circle, along with critical metals needed for electrification. However, most of that estimate is based on land studies and the offshore potential is largely unexplored.

More than half of America’s extended continental shelf — 520,400 square kilometers — stretches in a large wedge north of Alaska toward the Arctic Ocean, including an area that overlaps with Canadian claims to the seabed floor, according to the US statement.



The U.S. ECS - United States Department of StateU.S. Extended Continental Shelf The United States has ECS in seven offshore areas (Figure 1): the Arctic, Atlant...



Another 176,300 square kilometers lies in the Bering Sea, between Alaska and Russia, but falls on the US side of the maritime boundary between the two countries. Canada and the US don’t have a maritime boundary agreement in the Arctic and establishing the US outer limits in the Arctic “will depend on delimitation with Canada,” the State Department said in its executive summary.

Canada’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Law of the SeaThe 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which the US never ratified, governs maritime zones around countries. Under the law, countries have the right to any resources in the sea or seabed floor within their so-called exclusive economic zones, which can stretch up to 200 nautical miles off the coast.
But beyond that, they can claim economic rights to resources on or below the seabed floor where their continental shelf extends, although not within the water column. The seas above also remain international waters. Russia, Denmark and Canada have waited years for their overlapping Arctic seabed claims to be reviewed by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, a UN supported group, with Russia the first to receive a ruling earlier this year.

The State Department said in its response to questions that the US would need to establish maritime boundaries in the future with Canada, the Bahamas and Japan where their claims overlap. It added that the US uses the same rules to determine its extended continental shelf as in UNCLOS, which it said the Biden administration supports joining.

The decision to unilaterally delineate its continental shelf boundary, rather than to ratify UNCLOS and then submit a claim through the commission, may raise the ire of other countries, said Pincus at the Wilson Center.

“I think a lot of other countries around the world are going to have thoughts about how the US has done this,” she said. It also may reduce the likelihood of the US ever ratifying the law since a major reason for doing so would have been to make a CLCS claim, she said.

— With assistance from Courtney McBride and Dave Merrill