Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (3419)	2/17/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: dexx	Respond to of 27968

Andrew, you told Jane... << Yes, I did say at one point I was not longer posting here, but everyone got so excited about it, that I realized you guys needed some rational critical thought here. >> Let us be the judge of that. If you want, we can take a vote to see if anyone thinks we need your 'critical thought.' I vote no. You can leave now if you want. We are all old enough think critically and rationally without your help. You, like Little Engine, just can't stand anyone having any fun. Dexx

To: Andrew H who wrote (3419)	2/17/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Andrew, I dont have to wake up and smell the coffee. But I do share your concerns and therefore I am not all gung-ho on this investment. I realize the pitfalls, the uncertainty of this investment, yet I do my best to be rational enough to do my own research and realize that companies like FAMH sometimes need to find creative ways to raise cash to grow their companies. At least I am patient and supportive of the company. Afterall....this is not IBM where you might expect everything to be handed to you on a silver platter... Have some candy Jane

To: Andrew H who wrote (3419)	2/17/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: John Fairbanks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

With all due respect I haven't seen anyone here who isn't open to a rational discussion of the stock. We are going to take blind speculation about the company, either good or bad, with a big grain of salt. Basically with the info we have at hand that's just about everything except what officially comes from the company. I have seen several posts that feel Ira is misleading us and I don't have a lot of patience for that because it can't be proven. Your post about the "dilution" was not an example of rational criticism. It took "dilution" and labled it as a horrible thing that was going to kill us all. You didn't look at the earnings growth that would occur as a result and balance the effect on EPS. You ASSUMED a level of dillution for the line of credit which is impossible. You have also assumed that the company will use it totally when Brad made it clear from his conversation with Ira yesterday that they intend to solidify their current acquisitions prior to making more. If I sound ticked off it's because I've thoroughly had it with being insulted by people like you who tell me I am not open to listening to the "facts" about the company. I was doing DD on this company before you even walked on the thread throwing out your generalities. At least I can say you ARE a fellow investor unlike LE, and you have made some good contributions to this thread, again, unlike LE.