Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (203573)	1/5/2024 1:01:50 AM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 218635

Re <<translation>> ... no translation available AFAIK Re <<Forbes>> ... be very extremely careful about Forbes. I have ALWAYS found it to be suspect ... en.wikipedia.org. Forbes ( /f??rbz/) is an American business magazine founded by B.C. Forbes in 1917 and owned by Hong Kong-based investment group Integrated Whale Media Investments since 2014. [3] [4] Its chairperson and editor-in-chief is Steve Forbes, and its CEO is Mike Federle. [5] It is based in Jersey City, New Jersey. Competitors in the national business magazine category include Fortune and Bloomberg Businessweek. However, rule of naval this and that is straightforward, that the side with larger, longer reaching, harder hitting, faster moving (ships and trucks, and missiles (hypersonic)) more likely wins, especially if closer and closer to own shore. IOW, China would win in Western Pacific, Indian Ocean, and S China Sea, because its anti-ship missiles are comprised of a curation of sea-skimming supersonics, harder-hitting ballistics, faster-slamming hypersonic sorts, meaning Team US cannot fight through the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii to get near to on-station, and does not have the reach going toe-to-toe once near on-station, and would be greeted every which ways by trucks and ships and submarines way before the flotilla can launch planes and fire rockets. Team USA has no anti-ship ballistic missiles and has no counter to hypersonic anything, because it has no hypersonic anything. Re <<hypersonic this and hypersonic that making everyone’s navy obsolete?>> ... faster than anything can hit, and manuverable too, to zig-zag evade. Re <<ships>> thedrive.com Alarming Navy Intel Slide Warns Of China’s 200 Times Greater Shipbuilding Capacity americanmanufacturing.org.