SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (4452)2/17/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 6843
 
Petz, <application set for Winstone '98 is seriously flawed.>
It depends, but Z-D claims that their choice is based
on market share research. We can also argue about
contents of their scripts, and may want to start a
new thread, say, "Winstone vs. BAPCO":-)
(BAPCO uses the same approach - runs applications under
a scripted control).

IMHO, all this doesn't matter too much. All these
applications are doing approximately the same things
and call the same system DLLs. They differ only in
data contents and disk file clustering and layout.

Even more, I "believe" that the specific application
code itself consumes very little relative to the time spent
in system calls (I would not call it "overhead" though).
That is why even a new (and smartly written) part of
OS (NT vs 95) can make a significant impact on
application performance. All this amateurish ranting
about 16-bit code vs. 32-bit code hold little water
(technically speaking).

In any way, these benchmarks make much more sense for
the general buying public than so-called "synthetic"
benchmarks like various flavors of
mem/bench/dhry/whet/stones, STREAMs, BYTEmarks, etc.

BTW, the Netscape is now a part of Winstone98. Also included
(but not a part of the final WS score) are two
"task switching" benchmarks: porting data/graphics from
Excel into MS Word, and the same for CorelDRAW/WordPerf.

Regards,

Ali