To: E_K_S who wrote (74800 ) 1/7/2024 11:47:23 AM From: Harshu Vyas Respond to of 78482 Think some of those numbers are wrong. Dell has no book value (at all!) so cannot have a positive ROE. They run both an equity and working capital deficit. As for HPQ, Buffett got it wrong. Simple as that. Since 2021, net earnings have halved and revenues are down by 14%... hence, it's no surprise he's getting out. Dell hasn't suffered nearly as much as HP. If we want to consider leadership... Lores joined HP as an intern in the late eighties and rose up through the ranks, but does he make a good CEO? Often, you find that these "leaders" having done all the hard work and schmoozing, aren't cut out to take control of a company. I really don't think Lores has the ability to revamp HP's business. AND Lores has sold about $2m worth of stock in the last 3mo. Realise that he also owns less than $30m in stock... but took home close to $3m in cash comp last year (over $20m with stock comp and options). Michael Dell, otoh, at 19 founded Dell with $1000, took it public, took it private and then took it public once more battling off (and beating) Icahn twice and remains a majority shareholder. Took home $3m last year and doesn't take stocks awards. I know exactly who I prefer. As a kid, Jobs was my hero but as I got older, I realised Dell was heavily underrated. Is investing in your heroes a bad idea? Best, Harshu Vyas OT - Never liked Apple under Tim Cook because he just widened the moat and innovation has been lacking. Great. But not in the spirit of Jobs' Apple. And with AI, who knows how long Apple survives? Will people care for smartphones ten years from now? That moat that's been protected so dearly may mean very little. As my dad often reminds me, the iPhone was a game-changer and that was when Apple's future really brightened. That changed life and how people viewed smartphones (the first smartphone was made in '92). Will Apple get Appled and become an IBM or Xerox?