SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DSC Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Moe Damghani who wrote (3597)2/17/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: OldAIMGuy  Respond to of 4429
 
Hi Moe, That's a definite WOW!!! A foot in the door to what's acknowledged as the largest potential market for phones, etc.

Thanks,
Tom



To: Moe Damghani who wrote (3597)2/17/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: larry pollock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4429
 
It is good to see these contracts for the new Celcore acquisition. However, there is no indication as to the dollar amount of the contracts, nor the profit impact. In other words, how much is Celocore contributing to DSC's bottom-line. There are still other concerns with DSC. During the last conference call, the listeners were told that the Danish unit, with fourth quarterly revenues at the $41 million level, is still not at a break-even level. Further, listeners were told that the Danish unit is not expected to be at a break-even level until the second half of 1998. The third quarter 10-Q stated that the Danish unit has two problems:late introduction of new products, and the lack of acceptance of products available. The bottom line is that Danish unit, which is contributing 8%-10% of consolidated revenues and which has been owned since November 1994, continues to lose money. Relative to DSC's iMTN products, while revenues are improving, are not making money. The only good news is that DSC's slow-to-react-management dumped Airspan. From previous postings, Airspan cost shareholders plenty.

Going forward, there is uncertainty with MCI's level of business. The SBC-PACTEL combination also poses doubt. SBC, by itself, purchases nothing from DSC.

If Wall Street and the rest of the investment world thought that the Celcore contracts were of substance to DSC, our stock price would be something higher than it's current price of $19 9/16. In contrast, on September 21, 1995, our stock price closed at $63, an all-time high.

Periodically in earnings reports, DSC's chairman has stated that DSC is in the right markets with the right products. Yet our stock price is at $19 9/16, down from $63 in September 1995. WHY?

Our key competitors (Lucent, Tellabs, Northern Telecom) have all operated in the same business environment as DSC and, yet, the shareholders of those companies have been consistently rewarded with a higher stock price. Shareholders of DSC are not being rewarded!

When is DSC's outside board of directors going to wake-up and find a new management team? Time is not on the side of shareholders.