Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Severe Weather and the Economic Impact -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: johnlw who wrote (6620)	1/17/2024 2:43:01 PM
From: LoneClone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7196

OT If we stopped polluting the atmosphere by burning hydrocarbons today the atmosphere would clear out in decades. However, the contamination by radioactivity can last thousands to millions of years and we have no safe method of dealing with radioactive waste. None. Check out the Hancock nuclear site in eastern Washington, a true nightmare. Hence unless we can make fusion viable, even I favour wasting hydrocarbons by burning them over nuclear generation. LC