SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stuffbug who wrote (78103)1/17/2024 2:24:29 PM
From: LoneClone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
onepath

  Respond to of 78404
 
First off, anyone who cares about the future cares.

But turning to specifics, if companies don't engage in initiatives like this, they will have to be forced to do so by governments. I like the idea of getting out ahead and doing it on your terms rather than having to scramble to meet imposed restrictions later.

That's why I bothered to comment on it.

I hope your comment was not just an attempt to start an argument about climate change. You won't get far with that on this board.

LC



To: stuffbug who wrote (78103)1/17/2024 2:44:40 PM
From: kidl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78404
 
Many shareholders would have liked KRR include their expectations of how this power purchase deal could affect future costs but it's also understandable why they didn't as it would have called for speculation on future Diesel prices.



To: stuffbug who wrote (78103)1/19/2024 9:56:56 PM
From: onepath  Respond to of 78404
 
I do. And so does a lot of investment dollars and probably even more so in Australia which is phasing out its coal/oil and rebuilding its grid heavily with solar. Those companies which choose to ignore ESG concerns and actions might find themselves in the dark. Nice to see mgmt planning ahead.