Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (1434975)	1/22/2024 4:49:45 PM
From: Doren	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Respond to of 1573069

> inherently safe I'm not against nuclear per se. But we've been lied to many many times by that industry's spokesliars. I'll believe that when the industry gets its own adequate private insurance and pays for storage forever for their waste products. So far NO insurance company has been willing to take the gamble and even governments are unwilling to store or even move the waste. Until then... they're just fucking liars and we're idiots for allowing it.

To: Qone0 who wrote (1434975)	1/22/2024 4:54:28 PM
From: Doren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573069

> The problem with solar is storage It's not a big problem. It will be solved. After all we store chemical energy in big giant tanks that occasionally blow up right now in addition to ugly polluting refineries that catch fire. In addition geo is theoretically the cheapest form of electrons which is why bitcoin miners and aluminum smelters moved to Iceland. American Companies Still Make Aluminum. In Iceland. We have plenty of potential geo to round out safer more economical forms of energy. In the Salton Sea area companies are making lithium with the heat byproduct of huge geo potential. It just takes some time to get it all up and running. My ex's parents live near one of these refineries. I wouldn't. Refinery fires