Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1436099)	1/29/2024 6:17:33 PM
From: Broken_Clock	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584176

One wonders(me specifically) why you would post that after you debunked it at the time.... Oh, that's right, you call yourself a master troller. Wharfie, 214,629 deaths/ 7,638,596 cases =2.80979% death rate. That's among the confirmed cases. The death rates being reported assume that there are a lot of undetected, asymptomatic cases of COVID-19. I posted a while back explaining why even a death rate of 0.64% would be catastrophic: Message 32843720 People don't understand why a virus that has a 0.64% death rate can be MORE deadly than a virus that has a 50% death rate. Tenchusatsu P.S. - I find it hilarious that some people would take certain things from the CDC as gospel but not other things like mask-wearing. siliconinvestor.com In reality, any figures in 2020 were nigh useless(especially when known liar Rat posts in October of 2020). Per CDC: "CDC’s National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) collects and reports annual mortality statistics using data from U.S. death certificates. Because of the time needed to investigate certain causes of death and to process and review data, final annual mortality data for a given year are typically released 11 months after the end of the calendar year." cdc.gov