SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1436483)1/31/2024 1:07:02 PM
From: Qone01 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578987
 
>> “The few stations that are left that are not biased because they are, for example, outside of town in a field and are an agricultural research station that’s been around for 100 years ... their data gets completely swamped by the much larger set of biased data. There’s no way you can adjust that out.”<<

He's such an "expert" he has never heard of sea surface temperature. No heat Islands there.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1436483)1/31/2024 2:00:52 PM
From: Wharf Rat3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578987
 
"Trillions Spent On 'Climate Change' Based On Faulty Temperature Data, Climate Experts Say"

You mean climate deniers, not ex spurts.

Urban Heat Island – Favorite Skeptic Myth Debunked Again, This Time By Koch-Funded Science - DeSmog



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1436483)1/31/2024 2:01:03 PM
From: Eric1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578987
 
Really?

Not a single university or college in the world that has an atmospheric sciences department or climate research group at any of the said universities agrees with your statement.

They all agree the Earth is warming as a result of more greenhouse gasses being pumped into the atmosphere as a result of burning Fossil fuels.

But a growing chorus of climate scientists are saying the temperature readings are faulty and that the trillions of dollars pouring in are based on a problem that doesn’t exist.

Where are your thousands of actual scientists that don't believe AGW is actually happening?

What are the names?

Meteorologists don't specialize in climate.

They specialize in short term weather phenomena.