SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric who wrote (1439017)2/13/2024 8:29:29 AM
From: maceng2  Respond to of 1573102
 
<<I wonder why John Shewchuk has submitted no papers for review?>>

Just guessing here. He looks to be more interested in business the academia. i.e the applied science end of things.

raob.com

The RAOB software is used in other programs.

RAOB -- Weather Graphics

and there it is...

(Regarding Tim Vasquez) Weather Graphics utilises RAOB.

Air France flight 447 again.

About -- Weather Graphics

In 1998 Tim left the U.S. Air Force to put full time work into Weather Graphics. He greatly expanded his software products and began authoring a series of books for operational forecasters. He also began conducting training seminars and consulting work. Most recently he was recognized in the international media for his detailed studies on the weather affecting Air France flight 447 and appeared on the BBC, CBS Evening News, The Weather Channel, and other networks. He continues to live in Norman, Oklahoma. For more information about Tim Vasquez and his latest projects and interests, visit his personal website.

Air France 447 - AFR447 - A detailed meteorological analysis - Satellite and weather data (weathergraphics.com)

This study was significantly updated on June 1, 2011 in memory of the 2nd anniversary of the crash. Also it was precipitated by the renewed interest in the fate of the flight with the data recorders having been recovered a few weeks ago. Interestingly it appears that almost all of the conclusions in my earlier study were correct. The purpose of this update is to introduce some new information, make corrections where necessary, edit extraneous theories that can now be disregarded, and clean up the text a bit.

Looks like those guys know their weather systems OK.

Can John Shewchuk be so wrong about CO2 and AGW?

It's worth checking of course.

John Shewchuk certainly seems to have a bee in his bonnet regarding AGW.