Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PKRBKR who wrote (1439181)	2/13/2024 8:42:36 PM
From: Wharf Rat	2 Recommendations Recommended By Eric pocotrader Respond to of 1572953

"That's why models ignore it " Thing of it is, they don't ignore it. 2-2: Climate Models Iowa State University For a global climate model we determine values of temperature, wind speed, pressure, density, and concentration of water vapor, liquid water, and ice crystals ...

To: PKRBKR who wrote (1439181)	2/13/2024 9:32:21 PM
From: Land Shark	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Respond to of 1572953

What an ignorant assessment. Not true at all. Thanks for the half baked opinion, professor

To: PKRBKR who wrote (1439181)	2/13/2024 11:27:00 PM
From: denizen48	2 Recommendations Recommended By Doren pocotrader Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572953

Hey Einstein, if it's "incalculable" it comes from the fat belly of a loudmouth, and science doesn't make "arguments that fall apart," loudmouth right wingers do that.

To: PKRBKR who wrote (1439181)	2/14/2024 2:54:33 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572953

<< That's why models ignore it as the arguments fall apart when it is included.>> Thank you for that statement PKRBKR. It's good one. It ties together a number of threads that have been discussed here. I am not saying if it's true or not, but you certainly drew a feisty response from three of the FAAMD contributors. Maybe there is something in it? I am going to leave that open for now. I am sure a firmer conclusion can be made later on. I am going to repeat some thing that a number of the global warmer brigade have been harping on about. "I wonder why xxxxxxx has submitted no papers for review" Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 34569328 (siliconinvestor.com) It's not just Eric who is saying this... it's chiming up in several places. Our Climate change advisor "Roch" says the same little phrase when he "Debunks" Happer. Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 34569047 (siliconinvestor.com) If one looks at Roch's bio we have this. About Welcome to All About Climate, a channel dedicated to communicating climate science and combating misinformation about global warming. My names Roshan Salgado D'Arcy or 'Rosh' for short - I'm a PhD researcher studying the communication of climate change in modern media and I have formal training in earth and climate science (BSc Geology & MSc Climate Change respectively). I also work professionally in television production on science and wildlife documentaries for the likes of the BBC, National Geographic Channel, Apple TV+ and History Channel. These videos are intended to educate and are informed by and cite (where relevant) scientific literature. However, I'm only human (and I'm not a climate scientist) so mistakes may be made. If you find any please let me know so I can make appropriate corrections! Follow me on Twitter: @RSalgadoDArcy Tiktok: @all_about_climate And on Instagram: rosh_darcy (6) All About Climate - YouTube The emboldment is mine and I wish to draw attention to it. So we have someone who is proclaiming NOT to be a Climate Scientist actually taking a PhD "the communication of climate change in modern media" advising us on developments ? Note the question mark (?) In fact is I should have typed something like this... ?!??!!! smh ??!!? ffs ?!!!!!???? smfh ??? -lol- and so forth. It's a joke surely? I talk about "The Synchronised Press" on many boards. Who here will deny there isn't a massive problem with the owned and robotic press all coming up with the same version of "the story" with a total mind numbing uniformity? It is a problems that has intensified over the decades, especially since the Washington Post exposed Watergate. The lessons from the Vietnam War were learned when Operation Desert Storm came about and Iraq was invaded for the first time. The Vietnam War was largely lost on American TV sets when the something of the horror of war was bought home to the family living room. That is the period when the serious throttling of the press and suppression of freedom of expression started in earnest and has been refined ever since. imho. The media and the press has always been "owned", but never to such a degree. Some difference of opinion amongst the ruling elite was allowed. Now it's strictly theatrics only, as we laughably see every day. So lets get back to "Roch". An outstanding example of what is expected from a modern journalist these days. Does he modesty proclaim not to be a "Climate Scientist" (note the quotation marks I believe they are necessary)... ? YES. So any normal person, born and educated before the 1990's, would expect a good education, as a lay person, from the journalist, to hear both sides of the story. The essentials of the AGW pov and the "Natural Climate Change" pov. Note I did not say "Climate Change Deniers" as that is how childish this whole debate has become. It is like an episode of the "Young Ones", a clip that I posted earlier. From the days when the BBC used to produce quality TV. Watching "Roch" tells tells the whole story imho. I enjoy watching comedy (and partaking in it, playing the fool) as much as anyone. I burst out laughing reading WR's response to my critique of "Roch". I'm not on twitter, but I approve of it, too. "Rosh" is Roshan Salgado D'Arcy, about to become Dr. Debunker. Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 34569962 (siliconinvestor.com) That was quality stuff WR. At least as good as Vivian or Rick could come up with... *"Well, he is about to become Dr Debunker now"* & *"He is a geology graduate with an MSc in climate change and is currently "reading" for a PhD in the communication of climate change at University College London (UCL)."* my sarcastic quotation marks btw. Oh! very posh and intellectual -lol- Really, someone ought to write a play, it could be a block buster ! Time for me to get back to pushing penny stocks and chit coins I guess. That is at least as good as monopoly.