Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : THQ,Inc. (THQI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yuppy who wrote (3350)	2/17/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Brian MacDonald	Respond to of 14266

Don't know how he does his math. I presume he continues to increase his short position every time it goes up so that when it declines a bit, he can make it known that the stock is down a certain percentage (I guess from the absolute high - which he couldn't sell at anyway unless he was the MM) and that he's now WAY ahead. Based on what I've seen over the past year, I'll take Todd's estimates any day. OTOH, it's good to see the shorts back in. We do need some rocket fuel. See the following post from SL on Dec. 31/97: ======= To: +Sigmund (2857 ) From: +StaggerLee Wednesday, Dec 31 1997 8:28PM EST Reply # of 3350 Staggie's 10 treats for the New Year: Long:IIVI,WTT,ADMG,TLDCF,FSCNY Short:EGRP,YHOO,ONSL,THQI,MCOM SPX on 6/30/98: 880.45 SPX on 12/31/98: 744.20 You's guys (sic) talking about $35 -- might want to look at THQ's track record of post-christmas, first quarter performance. Hint: $14 is more likely than $25 by 3/31/98. Look for major jitters leading up to secondary anouncement in Jan. Happy New Year! =============

To: Yuppy who wrote (3350)	2/18/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: charles moore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14266

I keep telling you people that Stagger is not Short THQI. He is one of these people that makes a prediction hoping it will come true so everyone will think he knows what he is talking about. If he was "Short" he would know at what Price he shorted. The fact that he states "he shorted at 18 " and then states that "you should have shorted at his recommendation at 23" shows that he is trying to make himself appear right by stating he said "23" when it is under "23". Charles