Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1442528)	2/27/2024 5:47:24 PM
From: Eric	Respond to of 1571188

Without the influence of the greenhouse effect on our planet, the average surface temperature would be 255 Kelvin - which can also be expressed as -18°C or 0°F Gads, we have known that for well over one hundred years...

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1442528)	2/27/2024 5:49:50 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571188

Hi WR, "Not even Close" I have not actually done the calculation my self, here is the lecturer's screen here. The maths he used look OK, I just have not done the arithmetic. He says it too, and you can clearly see 13 deg C, 55 deg F Also Zoe Phin looked at the math too. In short.... And the difference is about 11.62 degrees C Now that is much less of a “greenhouse effect” than the fantastical 33 or 34 degrees claimed by mainstream climate scientists! This is all minor detail from the main argument. That only one variable (AGW) is the only controlling factor for our planets temperature. We (but not China, India, Russia,) have to starve and stay in our 15 minute cities eating bugs to stop the Planet getting warming ?! Rat... you have to be off your rocker to believe that.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1442528)	2/27/2024 6:10:51 PM
From: maceng2	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz miraje Respond to of 1571188

More from Zoe Phinn. Why the radiation-based Greenhouse Effect is a Fraud, Part 1 Why the radiation-based Greenhouse Effect is a Fraud, Part 1 – Zoe's Insights (phzoe.com) Why the radiation-based Greenhouse Effect is a Fraud, Part 2 Why the radiation-based Greenhouse Effect is a Fraud, Part 2 – Zoe's Insights (phzoe.com) "In most popular literature on this topic it is claimed that GHGs trap solar energy, but in reality they fabricate energy from GHGs because they want to show that they are responsible for why the Earth is warmer than what the sun alone can do. In reality they can’t actually show the causation in a scientific manner, they can only describe/declare/insist on a process using a logical fallacy. The radiation-based Greenhouse Effect is nothing but rhetoric devoid of any scientific merit. -Zoe" NASA’s subtle diagram Fraud NASA’s subtle diagram Fraud – Zoe's Insights (phzoe.com)