SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew H who wrote (15231)2/18/1998 8:08:00 AM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Andy, could you post the link to the Ligand interview in BusinessWeek (the one that was discussed here in lenght awhile back), I never did see the article (you know, the one that was to make Ligand a household name)



To: Andrew H who wrote (15231)2/18/1998 9:43:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Andy, The Business Week article was written by Joan O'C Hamilton who also writes for Signals Magazine. The Signals article, "Retinoid Renaisance is linked to the Background table at home.att.net which has the graphs a pictures along with text. The article was one of three that was predicted. The Financial Times article was somewhat muted by GLX pulling Rezulin in Great Britain. The NY Times article is also linked in the background table. As predicted, all three were on new treatments for diabetes and all mentioned LGND. Signals and Business Week were both well focused on LGND:

Lilly gets a Vitamin $hot from Ligand

The Retinoid Renaissance

Ligand Pharmaceutical's recent deal with Eli Lilly to develop
retinoids for diabetes puts a spotlight on these versatile cousins
of Vitamin A. Years after retinoids were approved for acne and
psoriasis, and later wrinkles, new indications in cancer and now
diabetes may mean the biggest markets are yet to come. This
class of drugs represents the kind of scenario biotech pioneers
have been dreaming of -- from both a scientific and business
perspective. Progress with retinoids reflects the fundamental
insights of biology, specifically cloned receptor drug targets,
paired with the power of small molecule chemistry.

By Joan O'C. Hamilton
Editor

Like chemical Forrest Gumps, some drugs keep popping up
heroically in the darndest places, turning their own presumed flaws
into advantages. Aspirin is certainly one such agent: It reduces
inflammation, and quiets a headache. Take it too close to surgery
and your blood won't clot -- but it's that same property that can
prevent a heart attack. In the biotech arena, interferons keep
showing new powers over the last two decades -- as anti-cancer
agents, dry mouth drugs, and even hepatitis therapies.

Now, another class of agents is making a splashy encore. We
know them as potent skin nostrums for acne, psoriasis, and more
recently as wrinkle smoothers. But chemical cousins of vitamin A
called retinoids are revealing some new possibilities, and they
have prompted a strategic shift for the biotechnology company
most actively pursuing them: San Diego's Ligand Pharmaceuticals.
Not only does Ligand have about a dozen trials ongoing using
retinoids to treat several forms of cancer and HIV, but now its lead
compound, Targretin, is showing impressive potential as a
diabetes treatment. In the space of two years, all this activity has
prompted, in part, the dismantling of one significant relationship,
the inking of another major alliance, and the beginning of a
footrace among a number of retinoid compounds to be the first to
market. It could open up a big opportunity in the booming drug
category of non-insulin diabetes drugs, forecast to more than
double from about $2 billion today to roughly $5 billion by 2005,
according to Front Line Strategic Management Consulting Inc.

Flying foxes and Turbo-Clearasil

For centuries, cultures have recognized Vitamin A's powers, albeit
often indirectly. Vitamins are chemicals the body doesn't produce,
but needs to ingest in order to maintain normal metabolic function.
Vitamin A is known, for example, to play an important role in cell
growth and differentiation, not to mention promoting healthy skin
and vision. Vitamins are obtained from food, synthesized in the
body by enzymes, and in Vitamin A's case, mostly stored in the
liver. For example, over 300 years ago, Chinese physicians used
the livers of flying foxes to cure night blindness. Modern physicians
follow exactly the same course, although the Physician's Desk
Reference offers a far less exotic explanation: "Retinal [a form of
Vitamin A] combines with the rod pigment, opsin, in the retina to
form rhodopsin, necessary for visual dark adaptation."

There are a handful of Vitamin A analogs on the market today,
mostly designed to shut off the damaging effects of proliferative
cell growth for skin conditions. In 1971, Johnson & Johnson won
approval for the retinoid dubbed Retin-A for severe cases of acne.
By the late 1980s, J&J began promoting research showing that the
active ingredient in Retin-A, a retinoid called tretinoin, reduced
wrinkles and brown spots. After a seven year wrangle with the
Food & Drug Administration over J&J's off-label promotion, J&J
finally won the right last year to sell the drug, renamed Renova, for
wrinkles.

Another retinoid on the market is Roche Laboratory's Accutane, an
oral formulation for very severe acne, and Roche's Tegison for
severe psoriasis. Allergan won approval just last June for Tazorac,
a retinoid marketed for psoriasis in the U.S., and, as Zorac, for
psoriasis and acne overseas.

But there's always been a catch: Retin-A is only approved for
severe acne, for example, because it can over-sensitize the skin to
sunlight and produce extreme skin irritation. Meanwhile, Accutane
is prescribed only under very controlled conditions. First and
foremost, it's teratogenic, meaning it can cause birth defects in
pregnant women. Moreover, it causes dryness in all mucous
membranes, soreness and pain in joints, and even mood swings.

In biology, however, a problem can often be
a clue to new insights. The broad array of
side effects was one clue that retinoids
worked through receptors that were
pervasive in the body, and in the mid-1980s,
basic biological study of the activity of
retinoids unearthed some new truths: It
seems that retinoids closely mimic the
behavior of hormones in the body, and exert
their activity by binding with intracellular
receptors, which in turn, directly turn genes
on and off inside the cell. Dr. Ronald Evans
of the Salk Institute discovered that All-trans-Retinoic-Acid, or
ATRA (the ingredient J&J sells as Retin-A), worked by activating a
particular receptor he dubbed the Retinoic Acid Receptor, or RAR,
which is also the mechanism through which several naturally
occurring hormones influence cells. Further, Evans showed that
ATRA also activated several other intracellular receptors involved
in widely different tissues. "Conceptually, it was a huge
breakthrough," explains Richard A. Heyman, senior director of
retinoid research at Ligand. By the early 1990s, Evans found
another related receptor called RXR, for Retinoid X Receptor,
which was also found in many key systems.

Next, came the
realization that the
lock-in-key receptor
mechanisms involved
with retinoids often
worked in pairs, like
both a deadbolt and
a main lock needing
to unlatch, in order
for a door to swing
open. Subsequently,
researchers have
discovered six or
seven cases where a critical pairing of receptors includes RXR,
including Vitamin D signalling (involved in calcium and bone
activity); thyroid hormone (regulates heart rate, liver function); RAR
activity (involved with cell growth); and PPAR -- which stands for
peroxisome proliferator activated receptors -- involved in glucose
signalling.

Death to vestigial tails

Knowing that underpinning suddenly opened up a new world of
possibilities to investigate: The retinoids' value in skin diseases
was fairly well understood, and related to the RAR mechanism
involving cell growth and differentiation. But companies began to
look for other ways to use retinoids for goals beyond the skin.
Roche uses the retinoid Vesanoid for a form of leukemia. A year
ago, Sparta Pharmaceuticals of Horsham, PA , sought to
investigate the retinoids' differentiating effects on several bone
marrow disorders characterized by a common stem cell defect.
With an agent called RII Retinamide licensed from the Beijing
Institute of Materia Medica, Sparta began clinical trials in the U.S.
and hopes to complete them before the end of next year. In 160
patients treated in China with so-called Myelodysplastic
syndromes, 60% had positive responses.

But Evans also found that retinoids were involved in so-called
apoptosis, or programmed cell death, which scientists believe
occurs either when a cell's internal clock runs out, or when it
perceives there's a defect in the cell and it should die before it
proliferates. Apoptosis is credited, for example, with making the
webbed feet and vestigial tail structures of a human embryo
disappear at a particular stage of development.

Cancer can develop when a DNA mutation in a cell evades
apoptosis, and the cells grow unchecked. Ligand scientists have
shown that activating RXRs with retinoids can trigger cancer cell
death. Today, the company is testing its Panretin and Targretin
retinoid compounds against a number of different cancers,
including head and neck cancers, ovarian cancer, several kinds of
skin cancer and leukemias. One value of this approach is that it is
markedly different from traditional chemotherapy, which generally
just wipes out fast-growing cells, friend and foe alike. Certain
cancers resist such treatment because they are not necessarily
fast-growing, including lung, colon and breast cancers. Using
natural mechanisms which are far more discriminating to damaged
cells could offer a new avenue to killing the cancer without killing
the patient. Indeed, the mild side effect profile of Ligand's retinoid
analogs against cancer, has been a significant positive result in
clinical trials to date.

Much of Ligand's work in cancer has been conducted with a
corporate partner, Irvine, Calif.-based Allergan. That five year-old
alliance began in 1992, primarily to pursue cancer, ophthalmic and
skin disorder products (the latter two being Allergan's key area of
expertise; press release). Ligand's bio-input was a slew of cloned
human retinoid receptors, used to assay and optimize potential
retinoid compounds. By 1994, Allergan and Ligand moved the
partnership to a new level and formed Allergan Ligand Retinoid
Therapeutics Inc. to further develop retinoids, and raised over $32
million in a public offering of rights to Ligand and Allergan
shareholders. (Allergan press releases: )

Poor, sweet little mice

David E. Robinson, Ligand's CEO, was
widely hailed for the innovative ALRT deal.
And once in hand, it fit into Robinson's
strategy to keep Ligand focused on oncology
and female health. Progress in cancer,
meanwhile, has been good. But about a year
ago, Heyman went to Robinson with a not
entirely welcome bit of news arising from the
work exploring the different receptor pairings
and how they could influence key body
systems. Heyman was growing increasingly
interested in the PPARs, which were clearly
linked with RXRs to regulate insulin and glucose signalling
--essential metabolic processes that go awry in diabetes. Heyman
directed his team to investigate whether retinoids working through
the RXR pathway could alter those processes. It turned out that
they found retinoids that did indeed show in mice that they could
sensitize cells to insulin, and reduce circulating glucose,
triglycerides and insulin levels -- all desirable in fighting the
disease (findings were published in Nature March 27, 1997).
Moreover, when paired with some new drugs such as
thiazolidinediones (or TZDs), the combination of the retinoids and
the agents specifically acting through PPARs alone worked
synergistically.

Heyman knew as well as anyone that one of the hottest drug
markets today is for non-insulin diabetes drugs. While insulin goes
a long way to helping stabilize the glucose levels in a diabetic,
there is a common misconception that having access to insulin is
essentially a "cure" for the disease. According to Simeon I. Taylor,
MD, PhD, chief of the diabetes branch in intramural research at the
National Institute of Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,
there are several problems with insulin that go beyond the obvious
inconvenience of patients having to inject themselves. "There is
some evidence that for patients who are insulin resistant at high
levels insulin can have undesired effects," he explains, and those
include promoting further weight gain, promoting appetite, and
possibly even accelerating the onset of atherosclerosis. Taylor
adds that diabetics typically get used to the bother of injecting
insulin; however, because insulin injection does not "cure" the
problems associated with widely fluctuating blood sugar levels, it is
the constant monitoring and planning that the disease requires that
becomes so intrusive. And for some diabetics, there is the reality
that "even if you do everything right, you can go blind, you can
have your kidneys fail, or have an amputation or a stroke," adds
Taylor.

Focus vs. opportunity

With those shortcomings as backdrop, Heyman went to Robinson
with the recommendation that Ligand pursue a diabetes indication
for retinoids, too. If retinoids were to work as hoped, they offered
two advantages over insulin: They could treat the disease
immediately, helping the body use insulin more efficiently, and they
might block progression of the disease in a way insulin often can't,
and at least diminish the cardiovascular damage, kidney damage
and neuropathies that can have such ongoing, painful and deadly
consequences for diabetes patients. At a meeting of senior
executives in mid-1996, a wary Robinson quizzed Heyman: "He
said, 'Rich if I give you one choice, metabolic diseases or cancer,
and you can only build one program, what would you choose?'"

"Metabolic," was Heyman's reply.

"It's not what (Robinson) wanted to hear," laughs Heyman today.
"He was tough but understanding. We had to rethink our strategy
and put it to our senior business people to identify a good partner."
Adds Andres Negro-Villar, Ligand's chief scientific officer, "It was
clear to us late last year if we were going to mount a serious effort,
you had to have multiple studies in thousands of patients," and that
meant hooking up with a big, experienced partner, well-versed in
diabetes.

By then ALRT had developed roughly 2000 retinoid analog
compounds, but Allergan clearly had no expertise in diabetes. And
then there were the messy details of the cross-development and
marketing agreement to clean up in order for Ligand to go forward
in metabolic disorders. "Metabolic disease was not contemplated in
the original ALRT contract," explains Negro-Villar, and so Ligand
went out and contacted a number of players, and also moved to
exercise the options of the ALRT deal. In September, Ligand and
ALRT announced they were buying back the rights from ALRT
holders at $21.97 a share, or roughly $71 million in cash and
stock. These shares cost ALRT holders $10 originally, but came
with warrants to purchase two additional Ligand shares for
$7.12/share until the year 2000. As a result, on the close of the
buyback, ALRT shareholders received $7.69 in cash per ALRT
share, plus 0.97 of a Ligand share, plus twice the difference
between Ligand's current stock price of $14.66/share and the
warrant strike price, for a total of $33.99/share.

Allergan, in turn, paid Ligand over $8 million to claim its rights to
half the products that arose from the collaboration. Divying them
up was not such a straightforward task, however. Targretin had
always been Ligand's agent, but Panretin and many other agents
were committed to various licensing and marketing strategies.
Eventually, the parties agreed to give Panretin to Ligand, and
several promising agents for acne and psoriasis to Allergan. In
diabetes, while Ligand walked away with the primary retinoids that
have been shown to be orally active in animal tests, Allergan
retained the rights to several other closely related "third
generation" molecules in that class that could also be potent
diabetes agents. Many other compounds were distributed between
the two partners by lottery, although in several cases, each partner
will share in the other's success by collecting one-third of
milestone payments from future partners, as well as a healthy
royalty cut from any future sales. (Allergan press release: )

By October 20, however, the deal Robinson had been telling Wall
Street he was committed to making this year became a reality: Eli
Lilly announced it was stepping up with almost $40 million in
equity, $12.9 million in up-front research, and about $50 million for
the next five years in research support, plus future royalty
payments, in exchange for significant rights to Ligand's retinoid
compounds in metabolic and other disorders (Lilly's press release).
Lilly president Sidney Taurel said the alliance was an "important
opportunity to transform our existing diabetes business into a
broad franchise in all phases of metabolic disease." Lilly already
holds a significant share of the U.S. market for insulin, including
porcine-derived insulin, and Humulin, genetically engineered
human insulin.

From partners to competitors

Allergan and Ligand officials don't seem to be crying any tears over
parting company, but in truth, the complex structure of
cross-royalties that continues will make them business associates
for some time. One of the most interesting things is that Allergan
has access to several retinoids it considers 'third generation'
molecules against diabetes that appear to be more selective than
the molecules Ligand retained, according to an Allergan
spokesman. Allergan is using the biological insights gleaned from
ALRT on another interesting product in development, as well. This
compound is not a retinoid per se, but rather an "inverse agonist"
aimed at the same receptor categories, and designed as an
antidote to the dry-mouth associated with retinoid therapy. "We will
now be head-to-head competitors in dermatology, oncology and
metabolic disease," says the Allergan spokesman, who adds that
Allergan will be seeking an experienced diabetes partner, too. "We
think we have an advantage," counters Negro-Villar, "but you can't
sit on that advantage."

Progress with retinoids represents the long-discussed but to date
fairly elusive potential of second generation biotech companies to
make the next great leap in drug development by combining
top-notch chemistry with biological sleuthing for the causes and
mechanisms of disease. In the next ten years these molecular
targets are likely to be at the core of much of the progress in
diabetes. Hambrecht & Quist securities analyst Richard A. van den
Broek believes the Lilly deal is an excellent one for Ligand and that
the company is a great example of chance favoring the prepared
mind: "You would never think that a retinoid (active in) skin
disorders could have applications in metabolic disease," he says.
With the expertise it's built up in unraveling molecular mechanisms
in signalling, however, van den Broek believes Ligand can become
a significant player in diabetes.

Diabetes. Acne. Cancer. Psoriasis. As Forrest Gump might be
inclined to put it, delving into the biology of retinoids may be like
opening a box of chocolates. Researchers just never know what
benefits they're gonna get.



To: Andrew H who wrote (15231)2/18/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Here's the NY Times article:

January 17, 1998
Drug Makers at Threshold of New
Diabetes Therapy
Related Articles
A Worm and a Computer Help Illuminate Diabetes (Dec. 30, 1997)
Clinton Unveils Plan for Fight on Diabetes (Aug. 9, 1997)
Diet-Diabetes Link Reported (Feb. 12, 1997)

By LAWRENCE M. FISHER
SAN FRANCISCO -- Few medical breakthroughs have been as
dramatic as the 1921 discovery of insulin, which changed diabetes
from a death sentence to a survivable disease.

But diabetes and its complications remain a huge
health problem. Now, a host of biotechnology
companies are racing to develop new therapies
that ultimately aim to go beyond merely treating
symptoms to attacking the cause of the disease,
in which the pancreas shuts down or fails to
produce the correct amount of the insulin
hormone, causing dangerously high blood-sugar
levels.

For many patients, frequent injections of insulin
may soon be only a memory.

Many diabetes patients could have the option
within two to three years of inhaling insulin rather
than giving themselves injections. But not long
after that, if all goes well, new oral drugs could
postpone or even prevent the need for some to
use insulin.

A new genetically engineered hormone could serve as a useful
supplement to insulin. Meanwhile, other drugs in the advanced stages of
development take aim at the complications that most afflict diabetics:
kidney failure, nerve damage, heart disease and blindness.

While the insulin market is dominated by two giants -- Eli Lilly & Co. of
Indianapolis, and Novo Nordisk AS of Denmark -- many new therapies
are the work of start-up companies. But these small concerns have been
able to trade their expertise in the complex biology of the disease for
lucrative partnerships with big drug companies, raising hundreds of
millions of dollars in research money from companies like Lilly, Pfizer Inc.
and Johnson & Johnson.

The need for new diabetes therapies was underscored late last year when
Glaxo Wellcome PLC halted British sales of troglitazone, an oral drug,
after it caused six deaths worldwide through liver damage.

Troglitazone, which Glaxo had licensed from Sankyo Co. of Japan,
remains on sale in the United States, where it is produced and marketed
by Warner-Lambert Co. under the name Rezulin. Officials of the Food
and Drug Administration and executives of Warner-Lambert say the
drug's benefits outweigh its risks.

"New science allows us to investigate specific pathways of the disease,
but we are still at a very early stage in our understanding of diabetes,"
said Viren Mehta, an analyst with Mehta Partners, a biopharmaceuticals
research firm in New York.

Some diabetics are resistant to insulin. Troglitazone, he said, is the first to
mitigate that resistance, "but even that is not well understood." Despite the
uncertainty and worries about adverse side effects, he expects
troglitazone and related drugs to generate several billion dollars in annual
sales before too long.

Troglitazone caused liver problems in fewer than 2 percent of patients, a
toxicity common to several successful drugs. But biotechnology
executives say both the drug's success and its problems highlight the
opportunity for a new drug with similar or greater effectiveness but fewer
side effects.

At $1,400 a year per patient, troglitazone set
a benchmark for what the health-care system
will pay for an innovative drug. With several
million patients for such a drug in the United
States alone, it could easily command
domestic sales of $1 billion a year.

Of the new drugs, closest to market is
Ergoset, from Ergo Science Corp. of
Charlestown, Mass. It is awaiting FDA
approval. Ergoset is a low-dose, fast-release
oral formulation of bromocriptine, a drug
previously approved by the FDA to treat
Parkinson's disease.

In clinical trials, Ergoset was at least as good
as existing oral drugs in regulating blood sugar;
side effects were limited to transient nausea,
nasal congestion and low energy.

Another promising drug originally aimed at a different disease is Targretin,
which Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. of San Diego has been testing against
various cancers.

When a lower dose of the drug was found effective in clinical trials against
one type of diabetes, Ligand licensed it to Lilly for $99 million in equity
and research financing, with a possible $75 million in additional payments
if the drug is successful. Targretin is in the second of the three stages of
clinical trials typical for new drugs.

Although the discovery of Targretin's role in managing diabetes was in
part serendipitous, it is in fact the first in a new class of drugs that
intervene directly between insulin and the proteins it interacts with inside
cells to regulate blood glucose.

"We can not only treat the disease, but in certain animal models we can
delay or prevent the onset of diabetes," said Richard Ligand's senior
director of research into drugs known as retinoids, which work within
individual cells.

Also working in this area of research is
Metabolex Inc. of Hayward, Calif.,
which has a broad program in
partnership with Abbott Laboratories of
Abbott Park, Ill.

More recently, Cell Therapeutics Inc. of
Seattle, and the City of Hope National
Medical Center agreed to form a joint
venture to seek out and develop a new
class of drugs that have the potential to
block destructive oxygen-carrying
molecules that attack the pancreas,
cause resistance to insulin and may
contribute to some serious side effects
of diabetes.

All these efforts are aimed at developing oral drugs for Type 2 diabetes,
once commonly called adult-onset diabetes. There are about 7.5 million
people in the United States for whom Type 2 diabetes has been
diagnosed and roughly 7.5 million more who are believed to have the
disease even though it has not been diagnosed.

Type 2 diabetics produce insulin, but their bodies have somehow become
resistant to it. Initially, many are treated with a combination of low-sugar
diet, exercise and oral medications like Orinase, which has been around
for decades. Most, however, must eventually inject insulin that is
manufactured from recombinant DNA or produced from animals -- most
often pigs.

Oral therapies have already surpassed insulin injections, and they are
growing fast. IMS America, a company that tracks sales of
pharmaceutical drugs, predicts that sales of oral therapies will triple to
$3.5 billion by 2002.

Patients with Type 1 diabetes, once commonly known as juvenile
diabetes, must take multiple insulin shots every day to survive. About
750,000 people in the United States have Type 1 diabetes, a disease in
which the body mistakenly destroys the beta cells in the pancreas that
produce insulin. There are no oral therapies for Type 1 diabetes.

Partly because it affects fewer patients, and partly because it is largely
controlled by insulin, Type 1 diabetes has attracted fewer companies. But
several are working on encapsulated pancreas cells from animal or human
donors, in hopes of eliminating the daily injections by creating a
sustainable source of insulin that could evade the immune system. Others
are trying to develop genetically engineered animals that could serve as
pancreas donors. Both efforts are a long way from fruition.

Closer to market, Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. of La Jolla, Calif., was
formed in 1987 to develop a genetically engineered version of the
hormone amylin, which is normally produced in the same pancreas cells
as insulin. Type 1 diabetics do not produce amylin on their own, either.

"In biotech, the majority of the big successes have been hormones," said
Howard Greene Jr., Amylin's chairman and co-founder. "If you have a
hormone deficiency, with a syringe and subcutaneous delivery, you're in
business." Amylin calls the drug Pramlintide.

Unlike insulin, amylin plays a role in the body that is not well understood,
but researchers who have worked with the drug say it should help
diabetics control their glucose levels without side effects like weight gain,
increased cholesterol and sudden drops in blood sugar. But in clinical
trials, Pramlintide has produced only modest results in Type 1 diabetics
and failed to help the more numerous Type 2 diabetics.

Greene attributed these equivocal findings to uncontrolled variations
within the trial. On the positive side, he noted that the drug has shown few
side effects.

He said that Amylin, and its partner, Johnson & Johnson of New
Brunswick, N.J., which has already invested $155 million in developing
Pramlintide, will proceed with four additional trials, with hopes of
demonstrating that it is safe and effective enough to lead to a possible
FDA filing in late 1999 or 2000.

While a huge study of diabetics in the early 1990s clearly demonstrated
the importance of tight maintenance of blood sugar levels in avoiding the
onset of complications, such control is difficult to maintain. An inhalable
insulin could prompt Type 2 diabetics not using the drug to start, and
encourage Type 1 diabetics to use it more often.

Inhale Therapeutic Systems, a small company based in Mountain View,
Calif., has developed a dry, powdered insulin that can be stored at room
temperature and can be inhaled rather than injected. Inhale has licensed
the system to Pfizer.

"We have confirmed that we can achieve levels of insulin similar to and as
reproducible as those with subcutaneous injections," said George Milne,
president of central research for Pfizer in New York. Pfizer hopes to file
for FDA approval in 1999.

In the absence of a cure, some companies are taking a pragmatic
approach. Shaman Pharmaceuticals Inc. of South San Francisco recently
began clinical trials of a compound based on a tropical plant that has been
used by indigenous cultures to treat the symptoms of Type 2 diabetes.

Alteon Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Ramsey, N.J., has focused on the
complications caused by high blood sugar and recently joined forces with
Genentech Inc. of San Francisco, a unit of Roche Holding and a pioneer
in biotechnology, to further develop a new drug, Pimagedine, which is in
late-stage trials for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease.

With the rapid development of molecular biology and immunology in the
last decade, "now there is a huge data base and technological base that
makes possible things that were inconceivable even five years ago," said
Michael Brownlee, co-director of diabetes research at the Albert Einstein
College of Medicine in New York and an adviser to Alteon.

"I've been pessimistic about making major advances, because I didn't
think the technology was there; now I'm enthusiastic," he said. "We're on
the threshold."



To: Andrew H who wrote (15231)2/18/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Here's the Business Week article for those who may have missed it:

BUSINESS WEEK ONLINE
December 5, 1997

THE HOT PURSUIT OF NONINSULIN
DIABETES DRUGS

Edited by Douglas Harbrecht

Shares of drug giant Warner-Lambert plunged more than 15% in early
December, after news that the diabetes drug Rezulin, which it began selling in
the U.S. this year, is prompting a dangerous liver condition in some patients,
and is being pulled from the market in Britain. The condition is still rare, and
Warner-Lambert and the Food & Drug Administration have said that while
doctors have been alerted there are no plans to recall the drug here.

Nonetheless, the Rezulin episode spotlights a critical medical need that drug
companies are scrambling to fill: Noninsulin therapies for diabetes. Rezulin is
one of the new "TZD" class of drugs -- or thiazolidinediones -- that appear
to diminish a patient's need for insulin. Researchers are still optimistic that
with careful monitoring, the side effects can be controlled and the majority of
patients will be helped by Rezulin.

But diabetics also have reason to cheer about another promising research
path as well -- an approach marrying cutting-edge biotechnology with a
cousin of plain old vitamin A. If work on these new agents, called retinoids,
pays off for diabetes, it could create a billion-dollar drug category for several
companies that are aggressively pursuing it. And it will be another surprising
use for vitamin A, an agent already linked to such disparate benefits as
treating night blindness, acne, wrinkles, and cancer.

Insulin: No Cure

There's a widespread misconception that insulin injections "cure" diabetes, an
illness characterized by excess sugar in the bloodstream caused by the
inefficient metabolizing of insulin the body manufactures. Diabetes afflicts
roughly 16 million Americans, at least half of them undiagnosed, and it
remains incurable. The complications of diabetics' long-term fluctuations in
blood sugar can include blindness and heart disease, making diabetes the
fourth-leading cause of death in the U.S.

Insulin, whether purified from animals or genetically engineered, helps smooth
out the fluctuations. It can only be injected, however, because it's a protein
that would be broken down in the gut if taken orally. And insulin causes
problems of its own, including weight gain or, when improperly administered,
severe complications including coma. "It's not injecting insulin that's such a
big deal," explains Dr. Simeon I. Taylor, chief of the diabetes branch of the
National Institutes of Diabetes & Digestive Disorders & Kidney Diseases.
Rather, explains Taylor, the problem is that the disease often progresses
despite the use of insulin and leads to diabetes' serious problems.

That's one reason why a several heavy-hitting drug companies, including
Warner-Lambert, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and
Bayer, have been developing noninsulin, orally active drugs, Today's roughly
$2 billion market for those pills is expected to more than double by 2005 to
about $5 billion, predict health-care marketing consultants at Front Line
Strategic Management Consulting Inc. Much of that jump was based on
hopes for TZDs. But even if TZDs have more limited success, new scientific
data is pointing to retinoids as a potentially powerful new member of the
noninsulin drug group. One eye-opening endorsement: Insulin market leader
Eli Lilly has inked a major deal with San Diego's Ligand Pharmaceuticals to
pursue retinoids.

Vitamin Roots

Since ancient times, cultures have recognized some of the medicinal powers
of vitamin A, which were discovered indirectly from eating liver. The liver is a
rich source of vitamin A, which, like all vitamins, is a chemical that's
necessary for healthy metabolic function (particularly healthy skin and vision).
But the body doesn't make it, so it must be ingested.

Since the 1970s, doctors have prescribed several kinds of retinoids, or
chemically synthesized variants of vitamin A, including topical creams for
acne and psoriasis and also potent pills for very severe acne. In the 1980s,
Johnson & Johnson drew the ire of the FDA for promoting its acne cream,
Retin-A, as a wrinkle smoother as well, although the drug was eventually
approved for that use. Roche, meanwhile, has another retinoid on the market
as an anticancer agent against a form of leukemia.

Then last March, scientists at Ligand Pharmaceuticals burst onto the diabetes
scene with a paper in the journal Nature, showing that two retinoids they had
initially developed as anticancer agents had dramatic effects in a strain of
diabetic mice: The retinoids reduced levels of three key measures of disease
in these mice, including glucose, insulin, and triglycerides. Ligand saw no
serious side effects in the trial, and because the company had already tested
its compounds extensively in cancer patients, "the data suggests these
compounds will be very very well tolerated," explains Richard A. Heyman,
who directs retinoid research at Ligand. He adds that more recent studies
have shown that "if we treat the animals early, we can block the progression
of the disease." The company is shooting to get the drug into human clinical
trials in the U.S. in 1998.

Pimples to Diabetes

One of the most interesting factors in all this is how and why researchers
made the leap from acne to diabetes. Credit biotechnology. Throughout the
1980s, as J&J fought marketing battles over wrinkles, researchers deep in
labs were intrigued with the complex side-effects profile of retinoids, which
ranged from skin inflammation for topical versions, to dry mouth, mood
swings, and even severe birth defects in babies born to women who had
taken the ingested forms of retinoids. Biotech was providing more and more
clues about cells and how chemicals interact with them through docking
stations called "receptors," and scientists at the Salk Institute in San Diego
led by Ronald Evans (a Ligand co-founder) zeroed in on a group of retinoid
receptors.

Evans eventually learned that many retinoid compounds are closely related to
certain hormones in the body and work on the same pairs of receptors.
Depending on the pair being activated, retinoids can spark different beneficial
effects -- among them, programming cancer cells to self-destruct, turning off
the over-proliferation of skin cells that leads to severe acne and psoriasis,
and, in the case of the diabetes work, increasing cells' sensitivity to circulating
insulin and making them process the energy from glucose more efficiently. "It
has been exciting, and it's moved incredibly fast," explains Heyman.

Indeed, work in this area has moved so fast that it created a minor corporate
upheaval for Ligand. Previously, the company was focused on cancer and
women's health. But about a year ago it added metabolic diseases to its
product research areas, after Heyman began seeing the results in the diabetic
mice. Ligand had been working with Allergan in Irvine, Calif., on retinoid
research aimed at skin, vision, and cancer uses. Results continue to be
promising in those areas, too, but Allergan is mainly a dermatology and vision
company with no experience in metabolic diseases such as diabetes. So, this
year the companies moved to dissolve their partnership and divide the more
than 2,000 retinoid compounds they developed together.

In September, meanwhile, Ligand anounced it had joined with Eli Lilly & Co.
to pursue metabolic diseases in a deal that is worth about $50 million in cash
and equity up front to Ligand but could be worth more than $200 million
over the next five years -- not including royalties from any drugs that result.
"Orally active compounds are where the [diabetes] business is going to go,"
says Andres Negro-Vilar, chief scientific officer at Ligand. "Lilly was very
perceptive about the science, and they have a strong business base in insulin."

Indeed, Lilly is currently the nation's leading manufacturer of insulin and a
long-time leader in the diabetes field. The deal with Lilly is "a compelling
validation of the technology" for Ligand, believes biotech analyst Richard van
den Broek of Hambrecht & Quist. Interestingly, Allergan has announced that
it is shopping for a partner for some of the retinoid compounds it got from its
relationship with Ligand, including some retinoid analogs also thought to have
promise in treating diabetes. That sets up a horse race between the two
former partners, Ligand and Allergan, who presumably start with exactly the
same research data about how these compounds work.

The Outlook

Although it's way too early to declare victory against diabetes, the work so
far is a source of optimism for diabetics and the physicians who treat them.
Advances with molecular targets mean that "the state of the art has
dramatically increased and [will] lead to an explosion of interest" in
treatments for diabetes and obesity, says the NIH's Taylor. In fact, Taylor is
working with Sugen in Redwood City, Calif., which is also using a
receptor-target approach to try to develop noninsulin oral drugs that would
reduce diabetics' need for insulin.

In fact, the dream of early biotech pioneers is slowly but surely coming true:
Rather than relying on serendipity and mass screening to find breakthrough
drugs, they are deciphering the intricate chemical dance between cells and
chemicals that governs our lives and health. And they're finding clues about
how to precisely correct the flaws that, in the human body, can sometimes
stop the music.

By Joan O'C. Hamilton in San Mateo, Calif.