Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1444197)	3/5/2024 2:00:01 PM
From: Qone0	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway pocotrader Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572502

>> If it moves at the acceleration of gravity, it means there was nothing stopping it from moving in the downwards direction.<< So the entire proof for the theory hinges on "it fell to fast at the speed of gravity" Lets examine this claim. For all support of the building to be knocked out at once. A charge would have to have been placed at the top and bottom of each steel column. And detonated simultaneously. There are 236 perimeter columns. This would require 472 charges per floor. 100 floors is 47,200 charges. This doesn't even count the core columns. Which all had to be placed in secret and detonated all at once. You have a serious problem with explaining that. But by all means try.