Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1444213)	3/5/2024 2:20:37 PM
From: Qone0	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572507

The theory has way to many holes it it. The number of charges needed to be placed in secret is just one of many. That make the theory Impossible First of all it did not fall at the acceleration of gravity. That is a false claim. In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at wtc.nist.gov, NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions. During the public comment period on the draft report, NIST was asked to confirm this time difference and define the reasons for it in greater detail. The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse: Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall). Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall) Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity nist.gov So the entire basis for the theory is false.

To: maceng2 who wrote (1444213)	3/5/2024 4:57:33 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

The buildings didn't fall at 1/2ATsquared......

To: maceng2 who wrote (1444213)	3/5/2024 5:35:22 PM
From: Doren	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572507

Dumbest thing ever. After the Muslims decided to attack us after we attacked them, they bombed the Trade Towers. World Trade Center Bombing 1993 That's when I told my mom it was no surprise... the only surprise was they hadn't been successful... yet. Inevitably they will be successful. And they were. Morons believe the other inane "theories." And inevitably they will be successful again. I could do it... alone... it would be easy. All they have to do is figure it out. You might notice most of the world is against our financing of the genocide in Gaza. That's a lot of VERY pissed off people.