Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: (Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (1081)	2/18/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6528

It stands to reason that shareholders will have a more positive outlook on a company. That's why they're shareholders. It's important, though, to find out why others aren't shareholders. One-sided information is useless. Both sides must be presented. True enough. And when the most vocal shareholders are unable to present facts* about a company, and choose to, instead, attack the non-shareholders, it's an important red flag.* The vice versa is also true. It's a two-way street. I got rid of 1/3 of my shares when it looked like the Riley/Pugs hype machine was in high gear on it, then the rest a few days later when it became obvious that the company itself is likely part of the game. Machine?? High gear?? Because they happen to like the stock, you think that constitutes a "machine" being in "high gear"?? I've often noticed some of the same shareholders'/posters' names on various SI threads. Do you think they are "machines" also because they like some of the same stocks?? Ridiculous. And to state "it became obvious that the company itself is likely part of the game" is, IMO, a dangerous and loose statement, especially since you don't - more likely CAN'T - back that up. This company is just now newly being formed. I, like probably many others, are anxious for additional news and info so we can see better what this NEW company is about and where it is headed. It would be presumptuous I think, at the least, for you to consider the company so disparagingly at this point in time and at this point in its formation, especially given the favorable information known about Mr. Raabe.

To: (Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (1081)	2/18/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 6528

Subject: Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| You have 1 unread message To: Bob Zumbrunnen (41937 ) From: Pugs Wednesday, Feb 18 1998 12:06PM EST Reply # of 41994 >>>>Could you share with us the profound inner workings of your mind that lead you to the conclusion that only shareholders should be listened to (in any stock) and that non-shareholders are "insignificant" and should be ignored?<<<<< I don't believe only shareholders should be heard, in fact, I believe, and I've posted this before, 'legal' shorts work to keep a co. 'honest' so to speak, that isn't what we have here Bob, we have a group of shareshakers dominating 2 threads that , not only have they no position in, one of the stocks isn't even trading!! s martin is on the threads from early morning to late night, stalking and attacking RMIL & TVSI investors. Tonto only posts misinformation, an example would be his 'job' on my posting on GRNO, I reproduced a post from GRNO demonstrating the terms under which I left the thread, did Tonto apologize for his 'misinformation'? Of course not, instead, he want us to focus on my veiw of the BOY SCOUTS!!(?), of which I HAVE NONE!!! We left the TVSI thread, because guys like Jonas were being hurt by the witch-hunt on me & Riley from these maggots...we left AWLT for the samer reason, and Tonto posts we're "baiting" the nays!! (????) Our 'PRESENCE' baits these cretins!!! WE LEFT THE THREADS as not to permit other small investors to suffer from the taNking attempts of these vultures; >>>> Subj: smartin Date: 98-02-18 09:30:01 EST From: XXXXXXXXXXX Reply-to: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX To: pugstko@aol.com Pugs, Good morning, I am composing a new complaint to XXXX over the fiasco with smartin and co., and how his stalking you guys all over SI, has really begun to hurt thousands of investors and their positions. I have AWLT, RMIL, TVSI, LOCK already noted. If there are others, would appreciate an update. This type of activity serves no positive purpose to any of these individual co's, but only serves to put doubt where doubt is not warranted. I understand the purpose of raising legitimate ?'s about certain aspects in investment criteria, but they have obviously gone far beyond that long ago. To put so many innocent people in the crossfire, obviously does not weigh very heavily in their minds, but should be a very serious matter to SI, and the potential joke that SI stands to become. In my humble opinion, they are already on their way to becoming just that, and may be the reason that their subscription charge hasn't increased like they said it would. And I also want you to know how I appreciate you not including my name when you posted my e-mail I sent, as I think you kept me from getting in the crossfire with you. You showed me that you are a trustworthy contact, which I regard very highly in this business. Thank you for that much respect, which I'm sure smartin is incapable of same. Thanks XXXXXX >>>>>>>> Tonto & Co. say they're here to expose 'scams' and help folks....they are hurting people, they are causing stress and pain to many small investors who have NOTHING TO DO WITH ME & RILEY!!! There is no exchange on these threads, we converse on the EMail threads....so why are the NAYS here from sun-up to sun-down? And Bob, by ignoring this, by embracing these cretins, you aren't embracing a healthy 'bear-ish' perspective, you're embracing shareshakers working their butt offs on behalf of a 5-6MM ILLEGAL naked short position @ RMIL...the cash almost here, and trading ready to resume...as for TVSI, where do you think we'll roll those TVSI profits Bob? Pugs RMIL & TVSI LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG BUSTING THE SHORT SOLIDARITY