Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (1448241)	3/22/2024 6:03:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1570560

CO, Apparently you cannot deny the facts around an human-caused rapid global warming. >!YAWN!< Been there, done that. Just because I pointed out your self-contradiction doesn't mean I'm a "climate change denier." I'm just here to point out that the developed world has less of an incentive to "solve climate change." We can spend a small (but not insignificant) percentage of our GDP adapting to said changing climate. But it truly is the developing world that will be most impacted by climate change. They don't have the resources to adapt. They'll have to suffer the old-fashioned way, i.e. through Darwinism. In that sense, "solving climate change" is the ultimate exercise in altruism. We in the developed world will pay for solutions that will have an outsized benefit on the developing world. You could say it's a moral obligation. But you can't argue in terms of an "amoral cost analysis." That's pretzel logic. You don't need that. Tenchusatsu