Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (282291)	4/4/2024 4:21:41 PM
From: Lane3	1 Recommendation Recommended By Doo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361921

Just taking a break from six weeks of 14 hour work days. Perhaps all that work explains why you didn't notice that in the trial the judge and jury were dealing with rape as defined by NY law, the case being a criminal matter, while the judge's use of the the word in his comments explicitly and directly differentiated as the common parlance, dictionary version, which is: noun unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the person subjected to such penetration. Both usages are valid. But it takes both critical thinking and a good-faith effort.