Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (282378)

4/5/2024 12:21:41 PM

From: Doo

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360633

How do you [Dems] write that off as though it doesn't destroy her entire story?

Oh, I don't know...maybe we just have faith in the judicial system, juries, and legal process instead of continually trying to destroy the rule of law when our golden turd gets flushed?

To: i-node who wrote (282378)	4/5/2024 2:35:59 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Respond to of 360633

donny says it never happened and he never saw her before .... she says it happened. The issue went to a jury who decided he was lying.

To: i-node who wrote (282378)	4/5/2024 4:50:03 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 360633

I have never watched Law And Order. But I somehow doubt that here testimony was identical to an episode of it. Some similarities, I have no doubt since such shows often model their episodes on actual cases. And what Trump was found guilty of is not that much of a rarity. But, what the hey. What episode of L&O did she supposedly use? Surely you must know since you keep citing it. Or are you going by someone else's opinion? Wouldn't his lawyers have brought it up during the trial?