Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (1450887)	4/8/2024 8:53:39 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579949

<< Your slamming of Cambridge is pathetic. One of the premier universities of the world. Obviously your ignorance is holding you back. Are you jealous of folks having much more education than you?>> No doubt Cambridge is one of the premier universities in the world and, uneducated as you state I am, I do know the difference between Oxford and Cambridge, a fact that seems to elude you. Do you understand what the the words "Partial Pressure" means in science? The Partial Pressure of CO2 on Earth is 0.3mm of Hg, the Earths Atmosphere being 760mm Hg. 39.5: Gas Exchange across Respiratory Surfaces - Gas Pressure and Respiration - Biology LibreTexts What is the surface pressure of CO2 on Mars? It's 5.7 mm of Hg. Atmospheric pressure on the surface of mars is about 6.0mmHg. the partial pressure of carbon dioxide(CO2) is 5.7mmHg. what percent of the Martian atmosphere is CO2? \| Socratic I millibarr being 0.75 mm of Hg. Convert millibar to millimeter of mercury - pressure converter (unitjuggler.com) So Earth's Partial Pressure component of CO2 is about 0.3/5.7= 5% of Mars CO2 Partial Pressure. and Mars is Freezing cold. Mars has 20 times the CO2 component of Earth but it doesn't seem to be heating it up much. Our CO2 component on Earth is nearer Mars then Venus. Hence my comparison. You need to do some real science instead of just learning by rote what the IPCC tell you. Some Biologists are a bit dumb that way. They cannot critically think themselves out of the cardboard box challenge. Edit: There is a slight error in an earlier statement of mine regarding Radiative transfer of heat. Radiation IN = Radiation OUT assumes there is no internal generation of Heat within the planet. Not the case with Planet Earth which has internal radioactive decay which changes things a bit.