Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451525)	4/11/2024 1:34:03 PM
From: Bill	2 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571068

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law..." Let's repeat that... the jury found that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’. The jury found that. Yes, you could call an assault a rape, but it's not a rape legally if the law says it's not. And that's what the jury found. (An anti-Trump jury)

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451525)	4/11/2024 2:35:37 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571068

>> That's easy ... Well it is not easy, because the accuser claimed she was raped. The judge claimed that she was raped. But the jury found that Trump had "sexually abused" the woman, and specifically NOT "raped" her. If she was digitally penetrated by Trump and that is tantamount to rape, then, they would found him liable for rape, NOT sexual touching. This seems a little technical, but it is actually quite specific: There were two jurors who did not believe the claim of sexual penetration, which there could be no finding of liability for rape. That is determinative. That the judge misstated, mischaracterized, or lied about the meaning of the decision. The jury's decision is final, not his personal view. No evidence credible evidence was provided of rape or even sexual touching. These were two jurors who clearly were under pressure to hammer Trump, could not go so far as finding he raped (or digitally penetrated) the woman, and chose to "split the baby" and find him liable for "sexually touching" the woman, something most men can be accused of at some point in their lives. When I was young, I did it as often as possible.