Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1451640)	4/12/2024 11:45:18 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Eric pocotrader Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571383

Inode, WTF does that even mean? You KNOW what it means. She got fingered in her pussy. There was no penile penetration, which is why the very narrow legal definition of "rape" wasn't satisfied, but the jury concluded that sexual abuse did occur. We know only that it DOES NOT encompass any form of penetration, or it would have been rape. This is ridiculous. The issue of whether she was raped or not has already been argued many times over. It wasn't too long ago that you were harping on Bill Clinton for sexual abuse. Yet here you are using Clintonian logic in order to defend Trump. Either way, you have to admit that Trump could have gotten away with it had he STFU and settled with E. Jean Carroll. Instead he's trying to milk it for all its political worth. All to convince you that he is being pErSeCuTeD, that it's a wItCh hUnT wItCh hUnT wItCh hUnT ... Tenchusatsu