Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1451802)	4/15/2024 3:20:46 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571204

BC, Why would the DOJ concern itself with a forgery? Let me correct myself. Yes, the diary does exist, and it was confirmed stolen. It was a mistake for me to compare that situation with Brandon Jr.'s laptop, whose existence was denied and dismissed as "RuZZian disinformation." However, Project Veritas won't confirm whether the book they paid money for was indeed Ashley Biden's diary, or if what they paid for turned out to be a forgery. Seems like even they won't go there. Meanwhile, a member of the Q Continuum publishes what he claims is a leaked copy of a page from the diary. That part is unconfirmed. Not even PV will confirm it. But the page is already being claimed as "authentic" by the Q Continuum. Disinformation only works when people want to believe it, and you can bet your bottom dollar that the Q Continuum wants to believe it. Tenchusatsu