Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451805)	4/13/2024 3:07:41 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571405

>> You still haven't proven that actual fraud occurred, or that the election was stolen, or that any cheating happened. Well, it has been shown that cheating did occur. That is, an unfair advantage to Democrats which changed the outcome of the election. That happened. But where we are in America today, the Hate Trump attitude dominates any legal due process that might occur. Just as clearly has happened and will likely continue to happen, in these bogus trials. So, no matter what evidence Ten sees, he's going to say, "Oh, but that's just a civil suit", or "Trump can afford it", and New Yorkers are going to say, "We hate that bastard. Get HIM". Tish James says, "I will get Donald Trump. And she, and the judge, conducted a fraud in their efforts to get him. There was no evidence on which the judge's decision was based, it was entirely based on his personal opinion, not fact. It is not relevant that Mar a Lago was appraised for $20 Million. There was no fraud. There was no victim. There was no money lost. NOTHING. It is really sick what we've witnessed, and I do believe history will get it right. ----- AS TO ELECTION FRAUD, WHAT SHOULD HAVE TO BE PROVED IS FAIRNESS. I don't care if votes are written on used cigarette butts. But fairness is the proper standard, and nothing else matters.