Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1452316)	4/15/2024 6:44:53 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571709

>> 1) Trump's character, or lack thereof. His word is complete shit. This, from someone who totally mistook a sarcastic comment that was over in 1.4 seconds as a statement of intent to be a dictator. >> 2) Trump's overreaction to Carroll's accusations, which all stems from the fact that he can't STFU. You realize that you could just as easily be accused of that exact charge and be entirely defenseless against it, don't you? How many times are men hit on in private settings when they are defenseless? I certainly did when I was younger, I'm sure most men have at some point. How could you disprove it? You couldn't in many situations. There is not ONE PROVED THING about her claim -- which was years after it was alleged to have happened, in the most unreal, outrageously absurd circumstances one could have imagined -- a major NYC department store with NOT ONE EMPLOYEE on the Lingerie Floor. Really? Seriously? You believe that shit? Meanwhile, the precise plot -- they're both lingerie shopping on the 7th floor with no employees (but cash registers and merchandise on the counters) anywhere on the floor, and they jointless end up in a dressing booth together. SO HE can try on lingerie. Trump. Right. Then, after it allegedly happened, the whole thing mysteriously ends up as an episode on Law & Order? >> Do I think there's a better than 50/50 chance that it happened? Yes I do. Please apply your mind, which I know to be brilliant, to the preceding paragraph and tell me you believe that is a 50/50 shot or better. Seriously.