Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (32531)	4/16/2024 11:25:37 PM
From: teevee	2 Recommendations Recommended By 3bar russet Respond to of 37496

yep, the corona is much hotter because that is where the constant rain of Fe nuclei in cosmic dust are transmuted into a cascade of lighter elements, releasing much energy.

To: russet who wrote (32531)	4/16/2024 11:30:16 PM
From: teevee	2 Recommendations Recommended By 3bar russet Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37496

yep, the corona is much hotter because that is where the constant rain of Fe nuclei in cosmic dust are transmuted into a cascade of lighter elements, releasing much energy. The pathway to power generation without radioactive waste should be transmutation using plasma reactors instead of trying to make fusion reactors work. Fusion is based on an incorrect model of the sun. Generating power through the correct solar model, based on transmuting heavy elements like iron into lighter elements with a net lower binding energy of the nucleus would likely be successful, and without the radioactive waste generated by fission reactors.