SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1452683)4/17/2024 11:03:06 PM
From: Mongo21164 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1572460
 



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1452683)4/18/2024 1:34:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Eric

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572460
 
BC,
No. I think we should make Israel comply with the Oslo 2 state Accords. If Israel did do so, the UN members would on its side.
That doesn't really answer my first question. Of course our official position is to get Israel to comply with the accords.

But it's unlikely that Israel's compliance with the accords will stop Hamas, Iran, Hezbollah, the Houthi camel fukkers, Islamic Jihad, etc. from continuing their quixotic campaign to wipe Israel off the map.

So let me ask the question in a different way.

Let's say Iran is getting ready to launch another round of drones, cruise missiles, and kitchen sinks at Israel.

Should we help Israel shoot them all down?

Or should we withhold our assistance until Net-N-Yahoo fully complies with the accords, stops his encroachment upon Palestinian settlements, and fully opens up Gaza to humanitarian aid?

These aren't easy decisions, unless you happen to be a mentally-deficient leader of the free world who has set his entire foreign policy on autopilot.

Tenchusatsu