Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: Linda Pearson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Ken, <(1) A bunch of people who have never invested in a stock before (until Iomega) who sit around and have tea parties together?> = people with opinions (2)The 'rest': - Wall Street - Wall street Journal - Herb Greenberg - PC week - analysts (Iomega only missed by a penny, remember) - Sony - Most institutions (look at the institutional ownership) - insiders. - et al...> = people with opinions Linda

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet	Respond to of 58324

biz.yahoo.com aC

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 3:30:00 PM
From: Cameron Dorey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

"Who do you think is more likely to be correct:" (3) Us. Cameron "Hey Rocky, watch me pull some intelligence out of the Internet." "Not again, Bullwinkle. That trick never works." "This time for sure!"

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 3:31:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 58324

KEN, you should look at the profiles before you characterize. That's what they're for. I have over 1000 shares of GE, over 1000 shares of MTC, over 1000 shares of SOI, etc., etc. That is not a tea party.

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Ken - The people and groups of people you lump in as "the rest" are by no means in universal agreement about any aspect of Iomega, the company, or IOM the stock. Your characterization of the people who post on this thread is also baseless. Your post is pointless. Here's another thing to consider. More than two years ago, I, a lowly computer consultant with very little investment experience, decided that IOMG would be a good investment, based on my belief that the Zip drive was a terrific product and the Jaz drive was even better. Iomega was not my first stock, but it was one of the first. At the time, the so-called "smart money" was betting against me. While it is true that the stock has had a serious haircut of late, there is no question that there was plenty of money to be made on the long side between then and now. And I have made money. - Allen

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (48148)	2/18/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: John Alan Wallace	Respond to of 58324

<<<I have a question for you guys: Who do you think is more likely to be correct: (1) A bunch of people who have never invested in a stock before (until Iomega) who sit around and have tea parties together? (2) The 'rest': - Wall Street - Wall street Journal - Herb Greenberg - PC week - analysts (Iomega only missed by a penny, remember) - Sony - Most institutions (look at the institutional ownership) - insiders. - et al... hmmm..>>> Good point Ken, Oh, BTW, do you place yourself under category 1 or category 2? I kind of like category 1 myself. JW