Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1453295)

4/22/2024 3:59:52 PM

From: maceng2

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
tntpal

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1570339

<< That's why there is a control group.>>

No your wrong wrong.

I don't have to prove squat. Nothing.

It's Pfizers job to prove the "vaccines" are safe and effective. The purpose of the control group is to measure background data exclusive of the product under evaluation. Any question regarding a result that has any doubt in it's validity, it's Pfizers job to prove with further testing that the doubtful result is clarified one way or another. End Of Story.

If you fail to understand that emphasis, you are hopelessly out of touch with what people expect from a new medical product. There seems to be a fashion in corporate thinking that people don't matter. There will be considerable resistance to that mindset.

Going by historical norms, the "vaccine" should have been pulled long ago. 2020 to be precise, there was enough data to make a decision back then.

Here is a history of previous vaccines that have been pulled from the market over safety concerns.

Note comments like "real/perceived", and perhaps you will see the light, what has been the normal safety standard expectation of a new vaccine.

TABLE 4. Vaccines removed from the market - Vaccine Development: Current Status and Future Needs - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov)

TABLE 4.Vaccines removed from the market
VACCINECOMMENTS

SMALLPOX	SMALLPOX ERADICATED
ORAL POLIO (OPV)	POLIO REGIONALLY ELIMINATED A SAFER VERSION (INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINE) WAS AVAILABLE THAT REPLACED THE LIVE ATTENUATED ORAL VACCINE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES
ROTAVIRUS (ROTASHIELD®)	SAFETY CONCERNS (IMPLICATED AS A CAUSE OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN INFANTS)
LYME DISEASE	SAFETY CONCERNS (REAL AND/OR PERCEIVED AUTOIMMUNE SIDE EFFECTS)
	ECONOMIC REASONS (ACTUAL MARKET PROVED MUCH SMALLER THAN ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED, EXPENSIVE LITIGATION)
ADENOVIRUS	ECONOMIC REASONS (THE COSTS OF ADHERING TO NEW GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE RULES WERE PROHIBITIVE FOR THE MANUFACTURER)
HEPATITIS B (PLASMA-DERIVED)	PERCEIVED SAFETY RISKS (HUMAN PLASMA WAS SEEN AS UNSAFE FOR VACCINE PRODUCTION IN THE WAKE OF THE DISCOVERY OF AIDS IN THE 1980S) REPLACED BY AN IMPROVED PRODUCT (RECOMBINANT HBV VACCINE)
HBV RECOMBINANT	SUSPENDED FROM USE IN SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN FRANCE PERCEIVED SAFETY RISKS (UNSUBSTANTIATED LINKS TO MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS)
WHOLE CELL PERTUSSIS	REMOVED FROM THE MARKET IN SWEDEN BECAUSE OF SAFETY CONCERNS (REPLACED IN OTHER MARKETS WITH THE ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS VACCINE)
KILLED MEASLES	SAFETY CONCERNS (ATYPICAL MEASLES)
HIB POLYSACCHARIDE	REPLACED BY AN IMPROVED PRODUCT (HIB CONJUGATE VACCINE)
NEURAL TISSUE-DERIVED RABIES	REPLACED BY AN IMPROVED PRODUCT (CELL CULTURE-DERIVED VACCINE)
INTRANASAL INACTIVATED INFLUENZA (ADJUVANTED WITH WTLT)	SAFETY CONCERNS (BELL'S PALSY)

The Pfizer Covid Vaccine has adverse event ratios orders of magnitude worse then previous vaccines pulled from the market over safety concerns.

No doubt about it. This has been repeated over and over again. I guess one more time should not do any harm.

But what to we have today??

How long until the eSafety Karens censor this because they‘ve decided that the content too distressing for Australians to see. https://t.co/f5QoVD1PRD
— Craig Kelly (@CraigKellyPHON) April 22, 2024

The forest of the fallen. This is just one location of course. Australia.

Home - Forest of the Fallen (theforestofthefallen.com)

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1453295)	4/22/2024 6:33:40 PM
From: Eric	2 Recommendations Recommended By pocotrader rdkflorida2 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570339

T Wrong. That's why there is a control group Spot on. Maceng2 doesn't have a clue. E

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1453295)	4/22/2024 6:34:29 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570339

Ref: "It's Pfizers job to prove the "vaccines" are safe and effective" per previous reply. Hey, Dr McCullough more or less said the same thing not more then an hour ago. "Culture of safety—presume the new product is related to the adverse event until proven otherwise. For genetic products that means 5 to 15 years after the last injection. Colossal error by @CDCgov to dismiss deaths as not related when they had no explanation. @profnfenton" Culture of safety—presume the new product is related to the adverse event until proven otherwise. For genetic products that means 5 to 15 years after the last injection. Colossal error by @CDCgov to dismiss deaths as not related when they had no explanation. @profnfenton pic.twitter.com/kWN5HLg9H7 — Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) April 22, 2024