SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (283760)4/22/2024 5:30:24 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361821
 
It was from the NYT.

I made a point of saying that I simply picked up the top one on Google's list. That doesn't suggest that there aren't other sources. Yours was not a straight question. Didn't deserve an answer at all.



To: i-node who wrote (283760)4/22/2024 7:29:40 PM
From: Mannie1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wharf Rat

  Respond to of 361821
 
Sorry, I just don't buy that BS anymore

but, you are certainly a seller.



To: i-node who wrote (283760)4/23/2024 5:15:52 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 361821
 
You may recall during the Mueller investigation CNN reporting a story based on "22 unnamed sources", which of course turned out to be false. OR 51 "former intelligence agents" which all turned out to be liars.

I don't recall that. Probably because it didn't happen. Just because you want something to be true it doesn't mean it is actually true.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News