Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Electric who wrote (6219)	2/18/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

hey dude..you were right...dell splits

To: Electric who wrote (6219)	2/19/1998 12:21:00 PM
From: j rector	Respond to of 42787

electric, you say: >> Great earnings are priced in already, a stock doesnt jump 18 points in 1 year on hype alone (although if it were based on the hype I have seen here it might ) Electric, the critical mistake you are making in this statement is examining the value of RADAF based on the stock price increase over the past year. This is a purely TA approach and has nothing to do with valuation fundamentals. If TA works for you keep at it, but I would warn you that most real financial experts believe that the entire field of TA is a crock--a ruse by WS designed to make the brokers more money. Just remember that a true fundamental approach values a stock based on discounted cash flow, NOT previous price history. I agree with you that 300% growth will be hard to keep up. Remember, though that if this was priced like a Dell, we'd have a PE of 100 for the company and the stock would be selling for $136. I maintain that the stock is priced EXPECTING that growth will be minimal this year.