SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (205532)5/5/2024 2:39:25 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217869
 
Re <<Elmatador>>

... is he still waiting for the Team USA to do the better-affordable interest rate ramp vs China?

:0)

In the meantime, whilst we wait, we watch & brief




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (205532)5/6/2024 1:37:30 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217869
 
I am finding USA a puzzle because of distance and too many lens angles through which I must try to see

dunno, just guessing, that there might be a few elephants in the living room of house of USA that impels demonstrations and counter-demonstrations, and I cannot fathom the end-game, because elephants might just settle down, forcing residents to retreat to own respective rooms waiting for the elephants to either wander away or intrude into the bedrooms

in the meantime, strangely, instead of addressing the issues of elephants, politicians of the uni-party prefer to point fingers to happenings and non-happenings, and imaginary happenings far far away

from perch of a kibitzer, one can be understood for mistaking the politicians are not busy doing the best for the best of the people they rule over after election balloting are all done for the locals, and foreign flags decorate the streets, and foreign place names resonated within legislative venues

I know I am interpreting events wrong, but it is not as if am not fed data

edition.cnn.com
Matt Pottinger advocating regime-change for China by the US, on the one hand

and on the other hand, some sort of complications that are not amenable for resolution
The Interlocking Of Strategic Paradigms



The Interlocking Of Strategic ParadigmsFormer MI6 spy writes that "Positioning scarce air defense ‘to save Israel’ therefore, exposes Ukraine (and slow...



it is almost as if there are at least two camps in the USA, normally working in concert and now at cross purposes, one wish to win in Ukraine and hold matters together in the middle east, and another to go and set up a win in Asia and hold matters together in the middle east, with neither group realising that Ukraine is already lost, and Asia shall be lost, with middle east matters unavoidably spilling all over the place

Today I heard that China was, and that China wasn't behind the street demonstrations across the USA, both by US officials. Call me very confused. Perhaps some folks are trying to take a go against China and others wish to double down against Russia.

Failed against Russia, try China.
What an idea. Brilliant. More brilliant than setting Mexico up as a failed state. Yeah, am being sarcastic for once.

In the meantime China shall continue to grow at 5.5+% per annum growth for a long time, because now that China has both the industry (65-70% of global capacity), the capital, and the brains, and no longer making socks along the coast, and improving neighbouring nations of SE Asia less Philippines, 5.5% is easier now and more so than ever before. The usual main stream economists missing the factors of efficiency improvement and value-add accretion in their projections for MSM publications

Am still waiting for China industry migration to ... drum roll ... vietnam ... to make a dent to China

Perhaps China industry migration to Mexico might make a difference, and if not, then eventually to Michigan?

The narrative is easy to do even if not correct. I remain agnostic and pay attention to 2026 / 2032, and a new number, 2042, when true demographic crisis happen in much iff the CW
cset.georgetown.edu

The Global Distribution of STEM Graduates: Which Countries Lead the Way?


safeguardglobal.com
Top 10 manufacturing countries in 2023


of the above 71.20, China occupies 28.4 on puffed up dollar basis

China = USA + EU + Japan + Korea + UK + …

included be little Russia in the ‘…’

Speaking of which
Russia, China eye nuclear power plant on moon – DW – 03/05/2024
Russia, China eye nuclear power plant on moon
03/05/2024March 5, 2024
Russia and China are "seriously considering" building a nuclear power plant on the lunar surface by 2035, according to the head of the Russian space agency Roskosmos.

Back to narrative


en.vietnamplus.vn
Rail route connects China, Laos, Thailand, Malaysia
The first China - Laos - Thailand - Malaysia express freight train recently departed from Chengdu, the capital of China’s southwestern Sichuan province, marking a significant milestone in regional trade connectivity.

thediplomat.com
Indonesia, China Vow to Expand Economic Cooperation
This week’s Belt and Road Forum has demonstrated that many Southeast Asian leaders still view China as central to their nations’ economic prosperity.


Back to audio visuals




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (205532)5/19/2024 4:02:15 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217869
 
Re <<Obama Biden Nuland Zbigniew and co conspirators with their war on Russia>>
Foreign Minister Lavrov revealed last month that when he met Antony Blinken in Geneva in January 2022, the U.S. secretary of state pretended he’d not heard of Biden’s undertaking to Putin on Dec. 30, 2021. Rather, Blinken insisted that U.S. medium-range missiles could be deployed in Ukraine, and only that the U.S. might be willing to limit their number, Lavrov said.

consortiumnews.com
RAY McGOVERN: Russia & China — Two Against One

Post Views: 8,929
May 17, 2024
Xi Jinping’s reception of Putin yesterday in Beijing sealed the increasingly formidable strategic relationship, fundamentally misunderstood in Washington.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping and their teams meeting in Beijing on Thursday. (Konstantin Zavrazhin, Kremlin)

By Ray McGovern
Special to Consortium News

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s extremely warm reception of President Vladimir Putin yesterday in Beijing sealed the increasingly formidable Russia-China strategic relationship. It amounts to a tectonic shift in the world balance of power.

The Russia-China entente also sounds the death knell for attempts by U.S. foreign policy neophytes to drive a wedge between the two countries. The triangular relationship has become two-against-one, with serious implications, particularly for the war in Ukraine. If U.S. President Joe Biden’s foreign policy geniuses remain in denial, escalation is almost certain.

In a pre-visit interview with Xinhua, Putin noted the “unprecedented level of strategic partnership between our countries.” He and Xi have met more than 40 times in person or virtually. In June 2018, Xi described Putin as “an old friend of the Chinese people” and, personally, his “best friend.”

For his part, Putin noted Thursday that he and Xi are “in constant contact to keep personal control over all pressing issues on the Russian-Chinese and international agenda.” Putin brought along Defense Minister Andrey Belousov as well as veterans like Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and key business leaders.

Joint Statements Matter

Putin and Xi in Beijing on Feb. 4, 2022. (Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)

Xi and Putin signed a strong joint statement Thursday, similar to the extraordinary one the two issued on Feb. 4, 2022, in Beijing. It portrayed their relationship as “superior to political and military alliances of the Cold War era. Friendship between the two States has no limits, there are no ‘forbidden’ areas of cooperation …”

The full import of that statement did not hit home until Putin launched the Special Military Operation into the Donbass three weeks later. China’s muted reaction shocked most analysts, who had dismissed the possibility that Xi would give “best friend” Putin, in effect, a waiver on China’s bedrock policy of non-interference abroad.

In the following weeks, official Chinese statements made clear that the principles of Westphalia had taken a back seat to “the need for every country to defend its core interests” and to judge each situation “on its own merits.”

Nuclear War

Thursday’s statement expressed concern over “increased strategic risks between nuclear powers” — referring to continued escalation of the war between NATO-supported Ukraine and Russia. It condemns “the expansion of military alliances and creation of military bridgeheads close to the borders of other nuclear powers, particularly with the advanced deployment of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, as well as other items.”

Putin has undoubtedly briefed Xi on the U.S. missile sites already in Romania and Poland that can launch what Russians call “offensive strike missiles” with flight time to Moscow of less than 10 minutes. Putin surely has told Xi about the inconsistencies in U.S. statements regarding intermediate-range nuclear missiles.

For example, Xi is aware — just as surely as consumers of Western media are unaware — that during a Dec. 30, 2021, telephone conversation, Biden assured Putin that “Washington had no intention of deploying offensive strike weapons in Ukraine.”

There was rejoicing in the Kremlin that New Years’ Eve, since Biden’s assurance was the first sign that Washington might acknowledge Russia’s security concerns. Indeed, Biden addressed a key issue in at least five of the eight articles of the Russian draft treaty given to the U.S. on Dec. 17, 2021. Russian rejoicing, however, was short-lived.

Foreign Minister Lavrov revealed last month that when he met Antony Blinken in Geneva in January 2022, the U.S. secretary of state pretended he’d not heard of Biden’s undertaking to Putin on Dec. 30, 2021. Rather, Blinken insisted that U.S. medium-range missiles could be deployed in Ukraine, and only that the U.S. might be willing to limit their number, Lavrov said.

The Mother of All Miscalculations

Biden and Putin meeting at the at the Villa La Grange in Geneva, June 16, 2021, flanked by Blinken on left, Lavrov on right. (White House/ Adam Schultz)

When Biden took office in 2021, his advisers assured him that he could play on Russia’s fear (sic) of China and drive a wedge between them. This became embarrassingly clear when Biden indicated what he had told Putin during their Geneva summit on June 16, 2021.

That meeting gave Putin confirmation that Biden and his advisers were stuck in a woefully outdated appraisal of Russia-China relations.

Here is the bizarre way Biden described his approach to Putin on China:

“Without quoting him [Putin] — which I don’t think is appropriate — let me ask a rhetorical question: You got a multi-thousand-mile border with China. China is seeking to be the most powerful economy in the world and the largest and the most powerful military in the world.”

The ‘Squeeze’

Putin in video conference with Xi on Dec. 15, 2021. (Kremlin)

At the airport after the summit, Biden’s aides did their best to whisk him onto the plane, but failed to stop him from sharing more wisdom on China:

“Russia is in a very, very difficult spot right now. They are being squeezed by China.”

After these remarks Putin and Xi spent the rest of 2021 trying to disabuse Biden of the “China squeeze” on Russia: it was not a squeeze, but a fraternal embrace. This mutual effort culminated in a Xi-Putin virtual summit on Dec. 15 of that year.

The video of the first minute of their conversation was picked up by The New York Times, as well as others. Still, most commentators seemed to miss its significance:

Putin:
“Dear friend, dear President Xi Jinping.
Next February I expect we can finally meet in person in Beijing as we agreed. We will hold talks and then participate in the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games. I am grateful for your invitation to attend this landmark event.”


Xi:
“Dear President Putin, my old friend.
It’s my pleasure to meet you at the end of this year by video, the second time this year, our 37th meeting since 2013. You have hailed … China-Russia relations as a model in international collaboration in the 21st Century, strongly supporting China’s position on safeguarding its core interests, and firmly opposed to attempts to drive a wedge between our two countries. I highly appreciate it.”

Is Biden still unaware of this? Have his advisers told him that Russia and China have never been closer, with what amounts to a virtual military alliance?

The Election

Putin has said he is aware that Washington’s policy toward Russia “is primarily impacted by domestic political processes.” Russia and China certainly assess that Biden’s policy on Ukraine will be influenced by the political imperative to be seen as facing Russia down.

If NATO country hotheads send “trainers” to Ukraine, the prospect of a military dust-up is ever present. What Biden needs to know is that, if it comes to open hostilities between Russia and the West, he is likely to face more than just saber rattling in the South China Sea — and the specter of a two-front war.

The Chinese know they are next in line for the ministrations of NATO/East. Indeed, it is no secret that the Pentagon sees China as enemy No. 1. According to the DOD’s National Defense Strategy, “defense priorities are first, defending the homeland, paced to the growing multi-domain threat posed by the People’s Republic of China.”

The Pentagon will be the last to sing a requiem for the dearly departed unipolar world. May sanity prevail.

Ray McGovern’s first portfolio as a C.I.A. analyst was Sino-Soviet relations. In 1963, their total trade was $220 MILLION; in 2023, $227 BILLION. Do the math.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (205532)5/19/2024 6:09:59 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217869
 
Something about a mistake



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (205532)6/5/2024 1:16:22 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217869
 
Re <<how many great ideas turn out to be bad ideas>>

... gold-bullish ...

zerohedge.com

Report Details US Troop 'Land Corridors' In Event Of European Ground War With Russia

NATO has a plan in place for rapid deployment of its forces in the scenario of a future Russian attack on Europe. It includes the development of "land corridors" which can be used to rush some 300,000 troops mostly American soldiers to front line positions in order to defend against a Russian invasion.

High-ranking British military sources described to the Telegraph that the plan entails troops landing at key European ports whereupon they would move east along pre-planned routes to counter potential Russian attacks.

Lt. Gen. Alexander Sollfrank, chief of NATO's Joint Support and Enabling Command (JSEC), described to the UK publication, "Huge logistics bases, as we know them from Afghanistan and Iraq, are no longer possible because they will be attacked and destroyed very early on in a conflict situation."

[url=]
Port of Rotterdam file image, identified as a key arrival point for US troops in event of major war in Europe.
[/url]

The logistics and troop transport corridors would originate in places like Greece, Italy, Turkey, The Netherlands, Norway - and the port of Rotterdam, a key northern European hub, is specifically named. Lines like the Germany-Poland railway are also mentioned in the report - all of which would theoretically allow rapid deployment of US forces to any NATO territory being threatened (based on Article 5 common defense).

Separate alarmist reports in UK media have been warning that the West should prepare for war with Russia at some point in the next two decades, connected with ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

For example, a prior March report in The Telegraph claimed that President Putin has a "paranoid obsession" with stoking conflict and provoking Western allies.

"Now that Russian President Vladimir Putin has secured his historic fifth term in office, it is patently clear that he will devote his next six-year spell at the Kremlin to pursuing his paranoid obsession of confronting the West," that prior stated.

As for the Telegraph's latest Tuesday revelation of the NATO land corridors with the somewhat loud and sensationalist headline of "Nato land corridors could rush US troops to front line in event of European war" the reality is that big picture contingency plans like this have been on US and NATO planners' shelves since the Cold War.

But without doubt they are getting dusted off amid the continued escalation of the Ukraine proxy war...

According to some of the further planning details laid out by The Telegraph and its military sources:

If Nato forces entering from the Netherlands are hit by Russian bombardment, or northern European ports destroyed, the alliance is set to shift focus to ports in Italy, Greece and Turkey. From Italian ports, US troops could be carried via land through Slovenia, Croatia to Hungary, which shares a border with Ukraine.

Similar plans exist to transport forces from Turkish and Greek ports through Bulgaria and Romania to reach the alliance’s eastern flank. Plans are also being drawn up to transport troops via ports in the Balkans, as well as through Norway, Sweden and Finland.

Lt Gen Sollfrank was further quoted as saying, "Ukraine suffers very much from these Russian long-range missile attacks on the logistic systems" - underscoring the importance of troop movements which would be out of reach of Russian systems.

The report includes visuals tracking 'land corridors' for Western troops en route to confront Russian forces in a future scenario...

[url=]Source: The Telegraph
[/url]

In the wake of the Telegraph report some pundits are saying this means WW3 is "starting now"... and while indeed at this point the world could already be witnessing the beginning phases (especially when historians look back), there's yet some escalatory steps remaining before missiles start flying over Europe. Hopefully saner minds prevail, even if at the last minute (though we don't have a lot of faith in this).