Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1455363)	5/7/2024 3:33:01 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577888

I never interpreted that as "cancel the Constitution". It was more like, "If a presidential election is being stolen, I think the Founders would be okay with adjusting the rules to get a righteous result." That is, allowing the theft of the election is worse than revising the Constitution to prevent the theft. It does, however, ignore the fact that the people stealing the election have already thrown the Constitution in the trash by virtue of the election theft, so I'm not what difference it makes at this point. I no longer see the Constitution as I did before the election theft. I expect there are some others who feel the same.