SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (1456219)5/12/2024 11:03:23 AM
From: koan1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Eric

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578133
 
You ruin your credibility when you post nonsense like that. You should know without even looking it up the 7% figure is not correct!

For a smart guy, you are not being very smart?

My son in law as a PHD in atmospheric chemistry science from a top university and is chairman of physics department at a northwest university and he says all credible scientist believe in GW.

He says:" we know:!

"This is from NASA's web page! You post one guy who is not even a atmospheric scientist.

science.nasa.gov

This is the correct amount:" Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here.

<<
Message #1456221 from maceng2 at 5/12/2024 10:53:54 AM

<<You think 97% of scientists are bought and paid for?>>

Is it true that 97% of scientists believe in man made global warming?

No!

Actually the figure is 7% NOT 97%.

You can see here, before the paywall comes up.

Corruption and Climate Change | Piers Corbyn (iai.tv)