Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david who wrote (5476)	2/18/1998 7:09:00 PM
From: Islander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

David: Hola! you said: 4TH KRY APPEALD THAT DECISION .IT WAS ADMITED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CASE IN SEPT 97..AND IS STILL IN STAND BY Can you determine whether or not it is true that only Mael has the right to further appeal any ruling that is a result of the above consideration? It has been reported that Justice Gomez has declared that there will be NO appeal of that consideration. If only Mael can appeal, and there will be NO appeal, then Mael must have won this case? Gracias por su ayuda...