Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bull_dozer who wrote (205733)	5/19/2024 11:21:38 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 220597

*>> the fcking fcks* Re <<From In Gold We Trust Report published on May 17, 2024>> I get advanced heads-up read from one of the authors :0) Re <<*Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China,* *Russia, and perhaps Iran, an ‘antihegemonic’ coalition united not by ideology* *but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope* *of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China* would likely be the leader and Russia the follower.>> I shall info Ronnie ... Superb report, cover to cover, and am just adding a possibility for consideration, that being, perhaps instead it is the case the current Russo-China relationship is way beyond whatever transpired back in the 1950-1960s, including the time when Russia helped China to get under way with the atomic bomb, and further, just-saying, this time the relationship is one of co-equals, with Russia at the moment being the hot tip of the hot sword in Ukraine and around the planet, and China being the cold blade of the cold sword around the earth, for the sword being dual-edged. Or might be the case, more likely, there are two swords working. :0)