SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1457813)5/21/2024 12:38:13 PM
From: Wharf Rat3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
Eric
pocotrader

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571803
 
"Korea, for example, is going to lose more people thanks to its 0.9 children per couple than any poor country that is subject to 'climate extremes.'"

Korea will lose population, but that's a lot different from losing people due to heat, fires and floods, famine, and drought.

For example,

Summer heat hits Asia early, killing dozens as one expert ...

CBS News
cbsnews.com › World



May 2, 2024 — At least two people died in the southern state of Kerala due to suspected heat stroke over the weekend. Two other deaths were blamed on the heat ...



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1457813)5/22/2024 8:29:39 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1571803
 
Did you know climate nuts were once in favor of "culling the human population?"



1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide


Posted on May 22, 2024 by Tony Heller
In 1991, UNESCO Magazine called for people to be eliminated at a rate of more than 100 million per year.

‘What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? ’Its a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run.
If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species.

It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”



Environment and development: a global commitment – UNESCO Digital Library




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1457813)5/22/2024 8:30:57 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1571803
 
The AAAS was for forced sterilization of women too:


In 1970, AAAS and Science Magazine called for forced sterilization of women.

“It should be easy to limit a woman’s reproduction by sterilizing her at the birth of her nth child.

The “right” to breed implies ownership of children. This concept is no longer tenable”



Parenthood: Right or Privilege? | Science