To: Tony Viola who wrote (9877 ) 2/18/1998 11:16:00 PM From: shane forbes Respond to of 25814
Tony: My influence with Wilf and Andy goes something like this: Will that be all Sir More tea Sir More wine Sir No Sir it's $1,500 a night for that friend, $2,500 for two friends... --- Still more on INTC and digital camera news:sumnet.com According to PMA statistics, 350,000 digital cameras priced at or lower than $1,200 were sold in 1996 and sales are expected to slowly increase to about 4 million units by the year 2001. Even that number, however, is a small fraction of the 50 million cameras that are sold annually, according to industry estimates. Intel's Mr. Whiteside says Intel knows it is going to be a long haul and it is prepared for the ride. "Our belief is that Intel needs to play a leadership role in the digital and video imaging industry. --- Using 350,000 in 1996 and 4,000,000 over 5 years yields a CAGR of 63% a year for the next 5 years. Since when is that considered slow? Perhaps they mean low volume for INTC's standards. --- Tony: Interesting thing about INTC moving into these markets is that the exact reverse thing happened many moons ago when LSI first embarked on the CoreWare journey. They did so to run away from bruising INTC competition in the chipset arena. Now 7-8 years later INTC wants in to LSI's realm. In 1995 INTC's big guns were laughing at (and deriding) LSI's Halla for the integration concept and the cheap Internet on a chip (STB) market. It's a funny world. Or: see Spot run, see Spot run, see Spot chase the gold at the end of the rainbow see Spot run. --- And you are right I think INTC wants to link everything to the PC. Though the above article suggests this attitude may be changing. Suspect that it would be wise for INTC to just do it and not worry too much about PC or non-PC. The days of a typical consumer paying 3,000 for a PC are fast vanishing. --- And finally on the patent thing, I think LSI has "System-on-a-Chip Company" as theirs. Just "System-on-a-Chip" I guess is not! ---