SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the traveler who wrote (1458889)5/26/2024 5:20:54 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
Eric
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1571911
 
Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán Sends Stark Warning to Putin Over Ukraine War (msn.com)

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has cautioned his ally, Russian President Vladimir Putin, regarding the likelihood of defeating Kyiv in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

Ever since Putin launched a full-scale invasion into Ukraine in February 2022, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which Hungary is a part of, has stood by Ukraine and denounced Russia’s “brutal and unlawful war of aggression.” This has put Orbán in a tough spot, given that Hungary has maintained ties with Russia.

During a radio interview on Friday, Orbán admitted that his ally may be in way over his head as the Russia-Ukraine war rages on. “If the Russians were strong enough to defeat the Ukrainians in one go, they would have been defeated, but that’s not what we’re seeing,” Orbán said.

His remarks have resonated across NATO, an alliance that stands in firm support of Ukraine. The Hungarian Prime Minister also dismissed fears of Russia turning its military might towards NATO, stating, “NATO’s strength is not comparable to Ukraine’s. A hundredfold, maybe a thousandfold, so I don’t think it’s logical to assume that Russia, who can’t even deal with Ukraine, will suddenly come and catch the whole Western world.”

The conflict in Ukraine has taken a serious toll on both parties, with recent data showing high Russian casualties and ongoing attacks on Ukrainian cities like Kharkiv. Orbán has stated his goal to prevent Hungary from engaging in activities beyond the military alliance’s borders. This decision, showcasing Hungary’s distinctive position within the alliance, requires a legal review of the nation’s role in NATO operations, as per Orbán. He maintains that NATO will not be involved in conflicts with countries outside the alliance.

The Hungarian leader has also been critical of what he perceives as a preparation for direct military conflict, particularly within European Union circles. “What is happening today in Brussels and Washington — perhaps more in Brussels than in Washington — is a kind of mood of preparation for a possible direct military conflict; we can safely call it: preparation for Europe to go to war,” he warned.

Hungary’s stance marks a noteworthy contrast within NATO and the EU. Several EU cities are concerned that, should Trump secure a second term, Orbán may support a potential Trump proposal to resolve the Ukraine conflict by negotiating a peace agreement with Moscow and giving up territory claimed by the Kremlin.

A senior official of a NATO country, granted anonymity to speak freely, said: “It’s not a surprise given his close ties with Trump and Putin. Let’s wait and see what Szijjártó tells us in Prague next week,” referring to Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó.



To: the traveler who wrote (1458889)5/26/2024 5:21:49 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1571911
 

Ukraine's Bold Move: Precision Strike on Russian Radar Escalates High-Stakes Conflict (msn.com)


In a daring escalation that has sent ripples across global security apparatuses, Ukraine has dealt a significant blow to Russian military infrastructure by striking an advanced missile defense radar system within Russian territory. This strategic strike targets the very heart of Russia’s early-warning network, underscoring the intensity and reach of the Ukrainian response in this ongoing conflict.

The attack, which was confirmed through satellite imagery, struck a Voronezh-DM radar station in Russia’s Krasnodar Territory. This specific radar is a critical component of Russia’s early warning system against ballistic missile attacks, with a range of up to 6,000 kilometers, which includes monitoring capabilities extending over the Crimean Peninsula and into the Mediterranean.

Defense Express journalists highlighted the significance of the location by stating that the “attacked system partially covers the observation area over temporarily occupied Crimea,” while its “main coverage area is the Balkan Peninsula, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Persian Gulf.” Furthermore, they noted the radar’s past detections, such as the probable launch of a ballistic missile into the Mediterranean Sea from Libya in 2013.

Notably, the radar in question had been capable of detecting the launches of long-range ATACMS missiles, weapons supplied to Ukraine by the United States which have been used with lethal efficacy against Russian military assets. With the newer batch of ATACMS offering extended range, Ukrainian forces are now able to keep a wider array of targets in their crosshairs, further pressuring Russian defenses.

However, it’s not just the tactical advantage that this strike represents. It’s the strategic implications that are of greater concern. Such a bold move against a component of Russia’s larger strategic early warning network could potentially degrade the country’s capability to detect incoming nuclear threats. This attack might also meet Russia’s publicly outlined conditions for a nuclear retaliatory strike, as part of their nuclear deterrence policy. The “Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence” includes a provision for the use of nuclear weapons in response to “attacks against critical governmental or military sites of the Russian Federation, disruption of which would undermine nuclear forces response actions.”

This strike follows closely after Russia commenced exercises involving its non-strategic nuclear forces, a measure said to be “in response to provocative statements and threats by certain Western officials.” The timing of Ukraine’s strike might not be coincidental, and indeed it may be a strategic calculation to demonstrate Ukraine’s capabilities and resolve.

The targeted radar site, part of an array of at least 10 Voronezh systems deployed along Russia’s southern and western borders, is vital not just for its early warning capability but also as a key component of Russia’s larger deterrence network. The loss or even temporary impairment of such a site could introduce vulnerabilities into Russia’s overall defensive posture, potentially triggering unintended escalations or miscalculations in a highly tense environment.

At the time of reporting, neither the Ukrainian authorities nor the Russian government have made official statements regarding the strike. However, the physical evidence of the attack cannot be overlooked. Satellite images show conspicuous damage and debris around the radar site’s buildings, with evidence of multiple hits leading to severe structural impairments.



To: the traveler who wrote (1458889)5/26/2024 5:22:41 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1571911
 

Ukrainian Precision Attack Destroys Russian Warship Tsiklon in the Black Sea (msn.com)


Ukrainian forces launched a long-distance assault on the Russian port of Sevastopol, resulting in the suspected sinking of a corvette.

The Ministry of Defence revealed that the attack involved one-way drones and tactical ballistic missiles from the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS).

In the most recent defense intelligence report on X, the MOD stated that the Tsiklon (Cyclone), a Karahurt-class corvette, was highly likely destroyed during the operation.

The Tsiklon was one of just four such corvettes operating in the Black Sea since 2022, with this attack signaling a notable reduction in Russia’s naval capabilities in the region. The strike on May 19, 2024, was a coordinated long-range attack which almost certainly resulted in the sinking of the KARAKURT-Class Corvette ‘TSIKLON’, according to UK Ministry of Defence Intelligence Update. This intelligence update underscores that the attack likely included a combination of one-way attack drones and Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles.

The implications of this attack are far-reaching. The destruction of the Tsiklon diminishes a key naval asset that Russia could have utilized for missile strikes, air defense, and other frontline operations in the contested Black Sea theater. Although the full strategic impact on Russian naval operations remains to be assessed, the loss of such a significant vessel demonstrates the ongoing threats faced by Russian forces in Crimea and the Black Sea region.

Further complicating matters for the Russian navy is the logistical challenge of reinforcing the depleted Black Sea Fleet. Given Turkey’s control over the Bosporus Strait, Russia’s ability to send reinforcements from other regional fleets is severely hindered, making the construction or transfer of smaller vessels via river the only viable, albeit limited, option.

This recent Ukrainian success is underpinned by their adoption of long-range munitions, including the Neptune ground-launched cruise missiles and domestically produced aerial drones, enhanced by international assistance in the form of advanced missiles such as the Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG from the UK and France, and several models of ATACMS rockets from the US. These contributions have evidently bolstered Ukraine’s anti-ship capabilities, as the strike that led to the sinking of the Sevastopol reportedly involved a barrage of M48s or M57s.

As the Black Sea Fleet’s defensive measures prove increasingly inadequate against such long-range precision attacks, Phillips O’Brien, a professor of strategic studies at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, observed, “If ATACMS are taking out Russian warships in Sevastopol, hard to see the base having much utility left for the Russians.” This sentiment captures the diminishing utility of Sevastopol as a naval base, potentially forcing Russian commanders to consider withdrawing vessels to southern Russian ports.



To: the traveler who wrote (1458889)5/26/2024 8:16:50 PM
From: Doren2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
pocotrader

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571911
 
> Just curious--

It's perfect for you... makes Scientology look rational.

en.wikipedia.org

Falun Gong is entirely based around the teachings of its autocratic founder and leader: China-born Li Hongzhi. [42] According to NBC News, to his followers, Li is "a God-like figure who can levitate, walk through walls and see into the future. His ultra-conservative and controversial teachings include a rejection of modern science, art and medicine, and a denunciation of homosexuality, feminism and general worldliness." [16] Hongzhi instructs his followers to downplay his controversial teachings when speaking to outsiders. [43]

The Epoch Times is a far-right[1] international multi-language newspaper and media company affiliated with the Falun Gong new religious movement.[



To: the traveler who wrote (1458889)5/27/2024 5:23:59 PM
From: denizen482 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571911
 
Well read it and then go fuck yourself.