SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (205878)6/1/2024 1:03:17 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217542
 
Little bit more clear if Bloomberg is to be believed.

Am still agnostic but leaning towards (1) the Trump did sign some checks, and (2) all political trials everywhere are less than fair

bloomberg.com

Trump Is Guilty on All Counts in Hush-Money Case. Now What?
Patricia Hurtado

1 June 2024 at 00:26 GMT+8
A jury in former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush-money trial took just two days to reach a historic verdict: guilty on all 34 counts.

The outcome is a win for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who was the first prosecutor in the country to file criminal charges against the former president. Trump still faces three other criminal prosecutions, though none are likely to wrap up before the November presidential election, in which he is the presumptive Republican nominee. Here’s a rundown of what’s at stake and could happen next.

What was Trump convicted of?

He was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records for payments made to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen.

The jury found Trump directed Cohen to pay $130,000 to adult-film star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election to stop her from going public with a story about a sexual encounter she said they had. Prosecutors argued that Trump reimbursed Cohen for the hush-money scheme with several payments recorded as “legal services” in company books. Trump’s team claimed the money was actually for legal work.

What happens now that Trump is convicted?

The next step will be for Judge Juan Merchan to sentence him, which is scheduled for July 11. That’s just days before the July 15 Republican National Convention, where the party is set to officially select Trump as its presidential nominee for the Nov. 5 election. Merchan allowed Trump to remain free until his sentencing.

A typical defendant convicted of a felony charge is sentenced to serve some prison time, but there is nothing in the law that requires it. Merchan could instead sentence Trump to probation, especially if he decides that leniency is warranted because the former president is 77 years old and a first-time offender. Trump could also be ordered to pay some kind of financial penalty.

Still, Merchan has made it clear that he takes white-collar crime seriously and already warned Trump he could put him behind bars for repeatedly violating a gag order. He also acknowledged the unique security requirements of imprisoning a former president under 24-hour Secret Service protection.

How long could Trump go to jail?

Each of the counts is a Class E felony, which carries a prison term from 1 1/3 years to four years. Merchan could impose a concurrent sentence, meaning the former president would serve his prison time simultaneously for each of the 34 charges on which he was found guilty. He could also order Trump to serve the counts one after the other, but legal experts have said that isn’t likely.

Can Trump appeal?

Yes, and he immediately vowed to contest the verdict, saying the fight was “long from over.” Under New York law he can only appeal his conviction after he is sentenced.

The first step would be a Manhattan appeals court. Eventually his challenge could make its way to New York’s Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court in Albany; Trump could eventually ask the US Supreme Court to weigh in. After Thursday’s verdict, judge Merchan rejected a bid by defense lawyer Todd Blanche to set aside Trump’s conviction.

It will be up to Merchan or a Manhattan appeals court to decide whether Trump can remain free while he appeals. While criminal defendants in New York state can typically be jailed while the appeals process plays out, that would not necessarily apply to Trump because he’s charged with a non-violent, white-collar crime.

Where might Trump serve time?

It’s not clear where Trump would serve any jail sentence, though the US Secret Service, which protects current or former presidents, has met with federal, state and city officials to discuss the possibility of Trump behind bars.

If Trump is sentenced to a year or less in prison, he could possibly serve it at New York’s Rikers Island complex, which includes seven jails. Allen Weisselberg, 76, the former chief financial officer of the Trump Organization who recently pleaded guilty to perjury, is completing a five-month term in a medical unit at the complex.

Does Trump’s conviction mean he can’t run for reelection?

Trump can still run for office. The US Constitution sets few eligibility requirements for the position, including no limitations based on character or criminal record.

Can Trump as a convicted felon vote in November?

The former president is registered to vote in Florida, home to his Mar-a-Lago estate. While Florida has one of the toughest restrictions on the voting rights of people with convictions, legal experts say under the state’s law, Trump can vote in November if he isn’t sent to prison.

How could the verdict affect the 2024 election?

The verdict feeds into Trump’s preferred narrative that he’s being unfairly targeted by a “deep state” bureaucracy and the Democratic administration of President Joe Biden, his likely opponent in the presidential election. After his conviction, Trump cast himself as a “political prisoner” and victim of a “rigged trial.” He’s received bumps in fundraising and in polls after other legal setbacks. His campaign reported raising $34.8 million in less than 24 hours after the jury’s guilty verdict was announced. It’s unclear whether moderate Republicans and independents will swing away from Trump now that he’s a convicted felon. If he wins reelection, the US would for the first time have such a person serving as head of state.

Can Trump pardon himself if reelected?

Not in this case, because the Manhattan case was brought by state and not federal prosecutors. (That’s also true in the case he faces in Fulton County, Georgia.) But in the two federal cases Trump faces, he could theoreticallydirect the Justice Department to drop the prosecutions if he’s reelected.

What’s the status of Trump’s other criminal cases?

There’s no trial date yet for Trump’s case in Georgia, where he faces state charges related to his efforts to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss. His election-interference case in Washington federal court is on hold pending a decision from the US Supreme Court on whether he has immunity from prosecution as a former president. And in Florida, where he faces federal charges of mishandling classified documents and obstructing justice, the case has been pushed back by the judge and no trial date has been scheduled.



To: carranza2 who wrote (205878)6/1/2024 1:05:13 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217542
 
sounds about correct

and might act as some sort of accelerant

bloomberg.com

Trump’s Conviction Is a Grim Sign for US Politics

Ultimately, the former president has only himself to blame for his conduct. But there’s no going back from this explosive decision.

Noah Feldman1 June 2024 at 00:50 GMT+8
Wall Street Billionaires Are Rushing to Back Trump, Verdict Be Damned

by Amanda L Gordon and Sridhar Natarajan

Why Trump’s Lies Didn't Work in a Courtroom
The trial process is carefully designed to expose the truth. Politics is another matter entirely.

Noah Feldman is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A professor of law at Harvard University, he is author, most recently, of “To Be a Jew Today: A New Guide to God, Israel, and the Jewish People."

Guilty.

Photographer: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

The historic felony conviction of former President Donald Trump marks a meaningful victory for the beleaguered American legal system and a win for truth over falsehood.

Three other criminal trials involving Trump have bogged down for various reasons. Two impeachments by the House of Representatives ended in partisan votes against conviction in the Senate. But in an ordinary New York courtroom, 12 men and women considered the evidence, weighed Trump’s various defenses, and concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that he was lying.

Trump has gotten away with lying to an extent unmatched in US history, and he may get away with it again in the November presidential election. In the courtroom, however, truth prevailed. That matters.

Understanding why Trump was convicted can tell us a lot about how the criminal justice system differs from large-scale electoral politics — and why the former is more resistant to the problem of lies and misinformation.

In court, Trump’s lawyers adopted a strategy of brazen falsehood, denying every element of the prosecution’s case, up to and including the allegation that Trump had a sexual encounter with adult film actress and director Stormy Daniels.

As any lawyer could tell you (and many legal commentators did, as the trial played out), this was a legally risky strategy. Trump had a better option: He could have admitted the affair and the cover-up and asserted that he was simply trying to avoid personal embarrassment and never knowingly intended to falsify records. That would have given his legal team a better chance of undercutting the basis of the felony charges against him: that he falsified the records to interfere with the 2016 election.

It seems pretty clear that the reason Trump’s lawyer went with the deny-everything approach is that it represented the essence of Trump’s entire (and largely successful) strategy throughout his political and business careers. Trump has come to learn that he can forcefully and regularly assert things that are patently untrue, and that plenty of the public will still vote for him.

Some of his supporters believe his lies literally, accepting, for example, that he really won in 2020. But much of the Trump-supporting public — it’s hard to say exactly how much — believe Trump’s lies in a more metaphorical fashion. That is, they believe there are forces out to get Trump and that in some grand sense those forces cost him the presidency in 2020. Either way, his supporters don’t have to test his lies against any concrete evidence. They can vote and act on the basis of a general feeling.

Not so in a courtroom. There, the authority figure of the judge (notably absent in the political context) tells the jurors what counts as evidence, spells out what law they should apply, and specifies what conclusions they should reach depending on what facts they believe after hearing the evidence.

Then, prosecutors trained in presenting facts lay out the evidence and propose reasons to believe that evidence. Crucially, the jurors have no choice but to listen, again unlike the domain of politics, where you can choose what information you’re willing to hear and from which sources. The defense gets the opportunity to question the prosecution’s factual assertions, to be sure. But the fight in the courtroom is supposed to be a fair one, with each side entitled to equal time. If the prosecution’s case is convincing beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant gets convicted. The rules of the game are designed to expose the truth.

Under these idealized courtroom circumstances, Trump was sure to be convicted. It’s no exaggeration to say that, if charged and tried in this way, he very likely would have been convicted in any court in the land, even in a venue dominated by Republican voters. He simply didn’t offer a defense that would function plausibly in a court of law, as opposed to the court of public opinion.

To be sure, the overwhelming majority of criminal cases never go to a jury at all. There is much to be said about the failings of the criminal justice system when it is all plea-bargaining. In Trump’s case, however, the jury trial embodied exactly what is supposed to happen in a criminal case: The facts were tested and the truth won.

If the criminal justice system were on trial alongside Trump, and came through with flying colors, the next test is our system of electoral politics. Now, we voters are on trial. Are we capable of accepting the factual truth that Trump is now a convicted felon? Can we translate that into the political truth that the president of the United States should not be a liar who has been criminally convicted in a court of law? That is a much different, and much harder test for us to pass.



To: carranza2 who wrote (205878)6/2/2024 6:43:53 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217542
 
am getting a little bit concerned, and uncomfortable, and even slightly with regard to gold / silver, for never a good sign when money, and money-money both disappearing from the table

finance.yahoo.com

U.S. Money Supply Is Doing Something So Scarce That It Hasn't Happened Since the Great Depression -- and a Big Move in Stocks May Be Forthcoming
Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 5:06 PM GMT+8
Over long stretches, Wall Street has demonstrated that it's a wealth-creating powerhouse. Compared to other asset classes, including gold, oil, housing, and Treasury bonds, stocks have handily outperformed on an annualized return basis over the last century.

But when the lens is narrowed to just a few months or a couple of years, the performance of the broad-market indexes becomes much tougher to forecast. In fact, the ageless Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI), benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), and growth stock-powered Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) traded off bear and bull markets in successive years for the first four years of this decade.

When the stock market is volatile, it's only natural for investors to seek out clues that might signal which direction stocks will head next. While there's no such thing as a predictive indicator or metric that can, with concrete accuracy, forecast where the major stock indexes are headed, it doesn't stop investors from trying to gain an advantage.



Image source: Getty Images.

However, there are a small number of indicators that have strongly correlated with historic moves higher or lower in the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite.

One such predictive tool, which hasn't signaled the warning we're seeing now since the Great Depression, appears to portend trouble for the U.S. economy and a big move to come for stocks.

This is a first for the U.S. money supply in more than 90 yearsThe forecasting metric I've alluded to above is the U.S. money supply. Though the U.S. money supply has five different measures, the two with the most merit tend to be M1 and M2.

M1 money supply takes into account cash and coins in circulation, as well as demand deposits in a checking account. Think of it as money that's very accessible and can be spent at the drop of a hat. Meanwhile, M2 factors in everything in M1 and adds in savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs) under $100,000. It's still money that's accessible, but it takes a bit more work to get to and spend. It's this category, M2 money supply, which is cause for concern.

Normally, little attention is paid to M2 money supply. That's because it's been rising with virtually no interruption for the last nine decades. With the U.S. economy growing over time, it's not surprising that more capital has been needed to facilitate transactions.

What's abnormal is a decline in the U.S. money supply -- which is exactly what we're witnessing right now with M2.

In April 2022, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve reported that M2 peaked at an all-time high of $21.722 trillion. For some context, that's up from $286.6 billion in January 1959 and represents a compound annual growth rate of approximately 7%. But as of April 2024, M2 came in at $20.867 trillion, representing a decline of nearly $855 billion -- 3.94% on a percentage basis -- in two years. It's the first time M2 money supply has backed off more than 2% from its all-time high since the Great Depression.

The stipulation to this decline that shouldn't be overlooked is that M2 exploded higher by 26% on a year-over-year basis during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple rounds of fiscal stimulus from the federal government, coupled with low interest rates, flooded the U.S. economy with capital that rapidly expanded the money supply. An argument can be made that the nearly 4% retracement in M2 over the last two years is nothing more than a normalization after a historic expansion.

I'll also point out that M2 has actually risen on a year-over-year basis. Despite being down 3.94% from its all-time high in April 2022, M2 is higher by a very modest 0.14% from where things stood one year ago.

Nevertheless, history has been quite clear about what happens anytime the M2 money supply retraces by at least 2% from its high -- and it's not good news for Wall Street or the U.S. economy.

As you can see in the post above from Reventure Consulting CEO Nick Gerli on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), year-over-year drops of at least 2% in M2 are quite scarce. Using data from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Census Bureau, Gerli was able to back-test these percentage changes in U.S. money supply since 1870. Over this span, just five instances were noted where M2 declined by at least 2% on a year-over-year basis: 1878, 1893, 1921, 1931-1933, and 2023.

All four previous instances of M2 dropping by at least 2% correlated with depressions and double-digit unemployment rates for the U.S. economy.

The good news is that the Federal Reserve and federal government are far more knowledgeable now about how to tackle economic turbulence than they were a century ago. The Fed didn't exist during the depressions of 1878 and 1893, and it was still getting its proverbial feet wet in 1921 and during the Great Depression. In short, there's a very low probability of a steep downturn in the U.S. economy in modern times.

But what this decline in U.S. M2 money supply does suggest is a good likelihood of the U.S. economy weakening in the not-too-distant future. If there's less capital in circulation, the expectation would be for consumers to pare back their discretionary spending. That's often a recipe for a recession.

Historically speaking, the bulk of the S&P 500's downturns have occurred after, not prior to, a U.S. recession taking shape.

With the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite all roaring to record-closing highs in 2024, the last thing you probably want is someone raining on your parade with a prognostication that calls for potentially meaningful downside to come in stocks. Thankfully, this is a forecast with little bearing on investors with a long-term mindset.

One of the most glaring examples of time being a powerful ally can be seen in the economic cycle.

As much as you might dislike the idea of economic contractions and recessions, they're a normal and unavoidable part of the boom-and-bust nature of the economic cycle. But what's important to recognize is that booms and busts aren't linear (i.e., they aren't mirror images of one another).

Whereas only three out of 12 U.S. recessions have reached the 12-month mark since World War II ended in September 1945, almost every economic expansion has endured multiple years. Two periods of growth actually hit the 10-year mark. While recessions can cause unemployment to rise and wage growth to slow, these effects tend to be short-lived.

You can see this same non-linear variance between bear and bull markets on Wall Street, too.

Nearly one year ago, the analysts at Bespoke Investment Group published a data set on X that examined the length of bear and bull markets for the S&P 500 dating back to the start of the Great Depression. What Bespoke found was that the average S&P 500 bull market lasted roughly 3.5 times longer than the typical bear market over a 94-year stretch: 1,011 calendar days (bull market) versus 286 calendar days (bear market).

Furthermore, there have been 13 separate S&P 500 bull markets that endured longer than the lengthiest S&P 500 bear market since the Great Depression began.

Want more proof that time is an undefeated ally for patient investors?

Earlier this year, Crestmont Research refreshed its data set from a report that analyzed the rolling 20-year total returns, including dividends paid, of the S&P 500 dating back to 1900. Even though the S&P didn't officially come into existence until 1923, its components (and their total returns) could be found in other major indexes prior to 1923 -- thus, the ability to trace rolling 20-year total returns back to 1900.

The analysts at Crestmont Research found that all 105 rolling 20-year periods they examined (1919-2023) produced a positive annualized average return. In simple terms, if you, hypothetically, purchased an S&P 500 tracking index at any point since 1900 and held that position for 20 years, including dividends, you'd have made money every single time.

No matter what Wall Street has in store for investors over the coming months, patient investors have the luxury of time as an undefeated ally in their corner.

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has nearly tripled the market.*

They just revealed what they believe are the for investors to buy right now…

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 28, 2024

has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a .

was originally published by The Motley Fool



To: carranza2 who wrote (205878)6/9/2024 11:36:46 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Arran Yuan
marcher

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217542
 
Btw, the coconut is having mega fun at her internship …

- share meals
- industry mixers
- one coffee per day
- observe filming
- study audience reactions
- tagging sponsors
- comedy clubs
- “making sure everyone gets paid for airtime”
- …
- coming up, coming up with some connecting skits to ensure connectivity between one iteration of her favorite show and the next iteration

Interesting, shall be publisher of a magazine in the upcoming school year.

Together with last summer’s script coverage work, historical research, location research, and master writing class, not exactly lawyer material but backstop path still open

She seems to find entertainment industry more entertaining :0)))



To: carranza2 who wrote (205878)7/8/2024 11:00:02 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217542
 
re <<legally>>

... in Hong Kong the loser (including government prosecution) must pay all the legal bills of the winning side

apparently not the case in USA ?

If so, setup less-than or altogether-not ideal. Fraught with issues.

npr.org.
Spacey was acquitted of all nine charges against him, including seven counts of sexual assault, one count of causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent and one count of causing a person to engage in penetrative sexual activity without consent.
zerohedge.com
You Can Soon Bid On Kevin Spacey's Baltimore Mansion

Actor Kevin Spacey, known for his lead role as Frank Underwood in the Netflix series "House of Cards," is facing numerous sexual assault accusations, all of which he denies. Recently featured on "Piers Morgan Uncensored," Spacey revealed he is on the brink of bankruptcy and is set to lose his Inner Harbor mansion in Baltimore City after amassing millions of dollars in legal bills.

Sixty-four-year-old Spacey told Morgan during the June interview that his five-story mansion at Pier Homes at Harborview "is being foreclosed on." He continued, "My house is being sold at auction. So I have to go back to Baltimore and put all my things in storage. So… I'm not quite sure where I'm gonna live now."

"I can't pay the bills [legal bills] that I owe," Spacey said, adding he has been able to "dodge" bankruptcy for now.

We doubt Spacey will be homeless, but his Harborview home is certainly slated for the auction block later this month.

[url=][/url]

Local auctioneer Alex Cooper is preparing to auction off Spacey's 9,069-square-foot condo built by the late developer Leroy Merritt on July 25 at the Circuit Court for Baltimore City.

A $100,000 initial deposit is required to bid, and there will be no bidding online. The opening bid starts at $1.5 million.

[url=][/url]

Here are more details on Spacey's home from the auctioneers:

***SUGGESTED OPENING BID $1,500,000***

Description from previous listing: Expansive 9,069+ square foot waterfront mansion. Property features 5 levels, 6 bedrooms, 7 full baths and 3 half-baths. Upgrades include an elevator, sauna, home theatre, rooftop terrace, multiple verandas and a four-car garage. (The above description and pictures are from a Realtor's listing on Multiple List when the property previously was sold and transferred for $5.65 million in 2017. There are no warranties or representations as to its accuracy.

Under a power of sale contained in a certain Deed of Trust from Clear Toaster, LLC, dated September 5, 2017 and recorded in Liber 19497, folio 56 and re-recorded in Liber 26452, Folio 181 among the Land Records of Baltimore City, MD, default having occurred under the terms thereof and at the request of the parties secured thereby, the undersigned Substitute Trustees will offer for sale at public auction at the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, at the Clarence M. Mitchell Court House, 100 North Calvert Street, Court House Door, Calvert Street entrance, Baltimore, MD 21202, on JULY 25, 2024 AT 9:15 AM.

The new owner of Spacey's home should really consider hiring a cleaning service equipped with blacklights before moving in.