Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (1460409)	6/3/2024 8:43:29 AM
From: Mongo2116	3 Recommendations Recommended By Celtictrader pocotrader rdkflorida2 Respond to of 1576767

To: Rarebird who wrote (1460409)	6/3/2024 8:55:21 AM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Respond to of 1576767

There should be separate rules for Trump. Remember he's mean! Come on man!

To: Rarebird who wrote (1460409)	6/3/2024 3:09:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1576767

Exactly, Rarebird. There are MANY politicians who have paid hush money to cover up something that may negatively affect their chances at getting elected. Trump vs. the pron star may have set a new legal precedent in making all hush money payments virtually illegal. I've asked this question on several forums, especially to people who adamantly claim that the verdict did not render hush money payments illegal. None of them could give me a satisfactory answer. To comply with the new standard means that no hush money payment could ever be hidden from public view ever again. Personally, I'm fine with this. In fact, I'm looking forward to all of the skeletons that will start falling out of closets on both sides of the aisle. On a side note, this is also why I like to troll both sides. I can see how both the rabid Trump supporters and the pathological TDS crowd are going to eat each other alive. What goes around comes around goes around. Tenchusatsu